Patch-Fool: Are Vision Transformers Always Robust Against Adversarial Perturbations?
Yonggan Fu, Shunyao Zhang, Shang Wu, Cheng Wan, Yingyan Lin
Abstract
Vision transformers (ViTs) have recently set off a new wave in neural architecture design thanks to their record-breaking performance in various vision tasks. In parallel, to fulfill the goal of deploying ViTs into real-world vision applications, their robustness against potential malicious attacks has gained increasing attention. In particular, recent works show that ViTs are more robust against adversarial attacks as compared with convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and conjecture that this is because ViTs focus more on capturing global interactions among different input/feature patches, leading to their improved robustness to local perturbations imposed by adversarial attacks. In this work, we ask an intriguing question: "Under what kinds of perturbations do ViTs become more vulnerable learners compared to CNNs?" Driven by this question, we first conduct a comprehensive experiment regarding the robustness of both ViTs and CNNs under various existing adversarial attacks to understand the underlying reason favoring their robustness. Based on the drawn insights, we then propose a dedicated attack framework, dubbed Patch-Fool, that fools the self-attention mechanism by attacking its basic component (i.e., a single patch) with a series of attention-aware optimization techniques. Interestingly, our Patch-Fool framework shows for the first time that ViTs are not necessarily more robust than CNNs against adversarial perturbations. In particular, we find that ViTs are more vulnerable learners compared with CNNs against our Patch-Fool attack which is consistent across extensive experiments, and the observations from Sparse/Mild Patch-Fool, two variants of Patch-Fool, indicate an intriguing insight that the perturbation density and strength on each patch seem to be the key factors that influence the robustness ranking between ViTs and CNNs. It can be expected that our Patch-Fool framework will shed light on both future architecture designs and training schemes for robustifying ViTs towards their real-world deployment. Our codes are available at https://github.com/RICE-EIC/Patch-Fool .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6c44000e-503c-429e-990c-68ca10918a3cCited by top-tier papers18
- Revisiting Adversarial Training for ImageNet: Architectures, Training and Generalization across Threat ModelsNaman Deep Singh, Francesco Croce, Matthias HeinNeurIPS 2023 · 119 citations
- Transferable Adversarial Attack for Both Vision Transformers and Convolutional Networks via Momentum Integrated GradientsWenshuo Ma, Yidong Li, Xiaofeng Jia, Wei XuICCV 2023 · 62 citations
- Pandora's Box: Towards Building Universal Attackers against Real-World Large Vision-Language ModelsDaizong Liu, Mingyu Yang, Xiaoye Qu, Pan Zhou et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 51 citations
- Robustifying Token Attention for Vision TransformersYong Guo, David Stutz, Bernt SchieleICCV 2023 · 37 citations
- Give Me Your Attention: Dot-Product Attention Considered Harmful for Adversarial Patch RobustnessGiulio Lovisotto, Nicole Finnie, Mauricio Munoz, Chaithanya Kumar Mummadi et al.CVPR 2022 · 33 citations
Builds on33
- Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted WindowsZe Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu et al.ICCV 2021 · 31,683 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentionHugo Touvron, Matthieu Cord, Matthijs Douze, Francisco Massa et al.ICML 2021 · 8,974 citations
- Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision TransformersMathilde Caron, Hugo Touvron, Ishan Misra, Hervé Jégou et al.ICCV 2021 · 8,921 citations
Related papers
- You Are Catching My Attention: Are Vision Transformers Bad Learners under Backdoor Attacks?Zenghui Yuan, Pan Zhou, Kai Zou, Yu ChengCVPR 2023
- Generating Transferable Adversarial Examples against Vision TransformersYuxuan Wang, Jiakai Wang, Zixin Yin, Ruihao Gong et al.ACM MM 2022 · 25 citations
- Towards Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Vision TransformersZhipeng Wei, Jingjing Chen, Micah Goldblum, Zuxuan Wu et al.AAAI 2022 · 156 citations
- Boosting the Transferability of Adversarial Attack on Vision Transformer with Adaptive Token TuningDi Ming, Peng Ren, Yunlong Wang, Xin FengNeurIPS 2024 · 24 citations
- When Adversarial Training Meets Vision Transformers: Recipes from Training to ArchitectureYichuan Mo, Dongxian Wu, Yifei Wang, Yiwen Guo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 109 citations
