Panini: Continual Learning in Token Space via Structured Memory
Shreyas Rajesh, Pavan Holur, Mehmet Yigit Turali, Chenda Duan, Vwani Roychowdhury
Abstract
Language models are increasingly used to reason over content they were not trained on, such as new documents, evolving knowledge, and user-specific data. A common approach is retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), which stores verbatim documents externally (as chunks) and retrieves only a relevant subset at inference time for an LLM to reason over. However, this results in inefficient usage of test-time compute (LLM repeatedly reasons over the same documents); moreover, chunk retrieval can inject irrelevant context that increases unsupported generation. We propose a human-like non-parametric continual learning framework, where the base model remains fixed, and learning occurs by integrating each new experience into an external semantic memory state that accumulates and consolidates itself continually. We present PANINI, which realizes this by representing documents as Generative Semantic Workspaces (GSW)—an entity- and event-aware network of question–answer (QA) pairs, sufficient for an LLM to reconstruct the experienced situations and mine latent knowledge via reasoning-grounded inference chains on the network. Given a query, PANINI only traverses the continually-updated GSW (not the verbatim documents or chunks), and retrieves the most likely inference chains. Across six QA benchmarks, PANINI achieves the highest average performance, 5%–7% higher than other competitive baselines, while using 2–30× fewer answer-context tokens, supports fully open-source pipelines, and reduces unsupported answers on curated unanswerable queries. The results show that efficient and accurate structuring of experiences at write time—as achieved by the GSW framework—yields both efficiency and reliability gains at read time. Code is available at https://github.com/roychowdhuryresearch/gsw-memory.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on24
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 3,415 citations
- Tent: Fully Test-Time Adaptation by Entropy MinimizationDequan Wang, Evan Shelhamer, Shaoteng Liu, Bruno A. Olshausen et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,731 citations
Related papers
- From RAG to Memory: Non-Parametric Continual Learning for Large Language ModelsBernal Jiménez Gutiérrez, Yiheng Shu, Weijian Qi, Sizhe Zhou et al.ICML 2025
- SegMem-RAG: Adaptive Memory for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Open-Ended Knowledge EnvironmentsXuanbo Fan, Tianqi Zhao, Yi Cheng, Chi Xiu et al.AAAI 2026
- GAM-RAG: Gain-Adaptive Memory for Evolving Retrieval in Retrieval-Augmented GenerationYifan Wang, Mingxuan Jiang, Zhihao Sun, Yixin Cao et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Beyond Fact Retrieval: Episodic Memory for RAG with Generative Semantic WorkspacesShreyas Rajesh, Pavan Holur, Chenda Duan, David Chong et al.AAAI 2026 · 3 citations
- FlowRAG: Continual Learning for Dynamic Retriever in Retrieval-Augmented GenerationSenlei Zhang, Tongjun Shi, Dandan Song, Luan Zhang et al.WWW 2026
