BRAINTEASER: Lateral Thinking Puzzles for Large Language Models
Yifan Jiang, Filip Ilievski, Kaixin Ma, Zhivar Sourati
Abstract
The success of language models has inspired the NLP community to attend to tasks that require implicit and complex reasoning, relying on human-like commonsense mechanisms. While such vertical thinking tasks have been relatively popular, lateral thinking puzzles have received little attention. To bridge this gap, we devise BRAINTEASER: a multiple-choice Question Answering task designed to test the model's ability to exhibit lateral thinking and defy default commonsense associations. We design a three-step procedure for creating the first lateral thinking benchmark, consisting of data collection, distractor generation, and generation of reconstruction examples, leading to 1,100 puzzles with high-quality annotations. To assess the consistency of lateral reasoning by models, we enrich BRAINTEASER based on a semantic and contextual reconstruction of its questions. Our experiments with state-of-the-art instruction- and commonsense language models reveal a significant gap between human and model performance, which is further widened when consistency across reconstruction formats is considered. We make all of our code and data available to stimulate work on developing and evaluating lateral thinking models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers5
- Puzzle Solving using Reasoning of Large Language Models: A SurveyPanagiotis Giadikiaroglou, Maria Lymperaiou, Giorgos Filandrianos, Giorgos StamouEMNLP 2024 · 9 citations
- COLUMBUS: Evaluating COgnitive Lateral Understanding Through Multiple-Choice reBUSesKoen Kraaijveld, Yifan Jiang, Kaixin Ma, Filip IlievskiAAAI 2025 · 8 citations
- MP: Endowing Large Language Models with Lateral ThinkingTian Bai, Yongwang Cao, Yan Ge, Haitao YuAAAI 2025 · 4 citations
- Creativity or Brute Force? Using Brainteasers as a Window into the Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language ModelsSophia Simeng Han, Howard Dai, Stephen Xia, Grant Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Measuring and Mitigating Rapport Bias of Large Language Models under Multi-Agent Social InteractionsMaojia Song, Pala Tej Deep, Ruiwen Zhou, Weisheng Jin et al.ICLR 2026
Builds on13
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural LanguageYonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Ronan Le Bras, Jianfeng Gao et al.AAAI 2020 · 2,916 citations
- Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task GeneralizationVictor Sanh, Albert Webson, Colin Raffel, Stephen H. Bach et al.ICLR 2022 · 1,976 citations
Related papers
- Weak-eval-Strong: Evaluating and Eliciting Lateral Thinking of LLMs with Situation PuzzlesQi Chen, Bowen Zhang, Gang Wang, Qi WuNeurIPS 2024 · 13 citations
- Down and Across: Introducing Crossword-Solving as a New NLP BenchmarkSaurabh Kulshreshtha, Olga Kovaleva, Namrata Shivagunde, Anna RumshiskyACL 2022 · 5 citations
- GGBench: A Geometric Generative Reasoning Benchmark for Unified Multimodal ModelsJingxuan Wei, Caijun Jia, Xi Bai, Xinglong Xu et al.CVPR 2026 · 7 citations
- VisualPuzzles: Decoupling Multimodal Reasoning Evaluation from Domain KnowledgeYueqi Song, Tianyue Ou, Yibo Kong, Zecheng Li et al.ICML 2026 · 44 citations
- Language Models Are Greedy Reasoners: A Systematic Formal Analysis of Chain-of-ThoughtAbulhair Saparov, He HeICLR 2023 · 38 citations
