Fitting summary statistics of neural data with a differentiable spiking network simulator
Guillaume Bellec, Shuqi Wang, Alireza Modirshanechi, Johanni Brea, Wulfram Gerstner
Abstract
Fitting network models to neural activity is an important tool in neuroscience. A popular approach is to model a brain area with a probabilistic recurrent spiking network whose parameters maximize the likelihood of the recorded activity. Although this is widely used, we show that the resulting model does not produce realistic neural activity. To correct for this, we suggest to augment the log-likelihood with terms that measure the dissimilarity between simulated and recorded activity. This dissimilarity is defined via summary statistics commonly used in neuroscience and the optimization is efficient because it relies on back-propagation through the stochastically simulated spike trains. We analyze this method theoretically and show empirically that it generates more realistic activity statistics. We find that it improves upon other fitting algorithms for spiking network models like GLMs (Generalized Linear Models) which do not usually rely on back-propagation. This new fitting algorithm also enables the consideration of hidden neurons which is otherwise notoriously hard, and we show that it can be crucial when trying to infer the network connectivity from spike recordings.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- Trial matching: capturing variability with data-constrained spiking neural networksChristos Sourmpis, Carl C. H. Petersen, Wulfram Gerstner, Guillaume BellecNeurIPS 2023 · 9 citations
- Temporal Conditioning Spiking Latent Variable Models of the Neural Response to Natural Visual ScenesGehua Ma, Runhao Jiang, Rui Yan, Huajin TangNeurIPS 2023 · 8 citations
- Mesoscopic modeling of hidden spiking neuronsShuqi Wang, Valentin Schmutz, Guillaume Bellec, Wulfram GerstnerNeurIPS 2022 · 6 citations
- Bayesian nonparametric (non-)renewal processes for analyzing neural spike train variabilityDavid Liu, Máté LengyelNeurIPS 2023 · 2 citations
Builds on2
- Rescuing neural spike train models from bad MLEDiego M. Arribas, Yuan Zhao, Il Memming ParkNeurIPS 2020 · 11 citations
- A new inference approach for training shallow and deep generalized linear models of noisy interacting neuronsGabriel Mahuas, Giulio Isacchini, Olivier Marre, Ulisse Ferrari et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 10 citations
Related papers
- A Differentiable Partially Observable Generalized Linear Model with Forward-Backward Message PassingChengrui Li, Weihan Li, Yule Wang, Anqi WuICML 2024 · 3 citations
- Efficient identification of informative features in simulation-based inferenceJonas Beck, Michael Deistler, Yves Bernaerts, Jakob H. Macke et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8 citations
- Backpropagated Neighborhood Aggregation for Accurate Training of Spiking Neural NetworksYukun Yang, Wenrui Zhang, Peng LiICML 2021 · 29 citations
- One-hot Generalized Linear Model for Switching Brain State DiscoveryChengrui Li, Soon Ho Kim, Chris Rodgers, Hannah Choi et al.ICLR 2024 · 8 citations
- Efficient Inference of Flexible Interaction in Spiking-neuron NetworksFeng Zhou, Yixuan Zhang, Jun ZhuICLR 2021 · 13 citations
