BLASER: A Text-Free Speech-to-Speech Translation Evaluation Metric
Mingda Chen, Paul-Ambroise Duquenne, Pierre Andrews, Justine Kao, Alexandre Mourachko, Holger Schwenk, Marta R. Costa-jussà
Abstract
End-to-End speech-to-speech translation (S2ST) is generally evaluated with text-based metrics. This means that generated speech has to be automatically transcribed, making the evaluation dependent on the availability and quality of automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems. In this paper, we propose a text-free evaluation metric for end-to-end S2ST, named BLASER, to avoid the dependency on ASR systems. BLASER leverages a multilingual multimodal encoder to directly encode the speech segments for source input, translation output and reference into a shared embedding space and computes a score of the translation quality that can be used as a proxy to human evaluation. To evaluate our approach, we construct training and evaluation sets from more than 40k human annotations covering seven language directions. The best results of BLASER are achieved by training with supervision from human rating scores. We show that when evaluated at the sentence level, BLASER correlates significantly better with human judgment compared to ASRdependent metrics including ASR-SENTBLEU in all translation directions and ASR-COMET in five of them. Our analysis shows combining speech and text as inputs to BLASER does not increase the correlation with human scores, but best correlations are achieved when using speech, which motivates the goal of our research. Moreover, we show that using ASR for references is detrimental for text-based metrics. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Sentence-level Aggregation of Lexical Metrics Correlates Stronger with Human Judgements than Corpus-level AggregationPaulo R. Cavalin, Pedro Henrique Domingues, Claudio S. PinhanezAAAI 2025 · 5 citations
- SpeechQE: Estimating the Quality of Direct Speech TranslationHyoJung Han, Kevin Duh, Marine CarpuatEMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- HAT: Hallucination Annotation for TranslationRajen Chatterjee, Xintong Li, Paisarn Charoenpornsawat, Allen LeeACL 2026
Builds on12
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at ScaleAlexis Conneau, Kartikay Khandelwal, Naman Goyal, Vishrav Chaudhary et al.ACL 2020 · 539 citations
- High Fidelity Speech Synthesis with Adversarial NetworksMikolaj Binkowski, Jeff Donahue, Sander Dieleman, Aidan Clark et al.ICLR 2020 · 263 citations
- Direct Speech-to-Speech Translation With Discrete UnitsAnn Lee, Peng-Jen Chen, Changhan Wang, Jiatao Gu et al.ACL 2022 · 235 citations
- Towards Building ASR Systems for the Next Billion UsersTahir Javed, Sumanth Doddapaneni, Abhigyan Raman, Kaushal Santosh Bhogale et al.AAAI 2022 · 86 citations
Related papers
- Discrete Cross-Modal Alignment Enables Zero-Shot Speech TranslationChen Wang, Yuchen Liu, Boxing Chen, Jiajun Zhang et al.EMNLP 2022 · 3 citations
- MT-Ranker: Reference-free machine translation evaluation by inter-system rankingIbraheem Muhammad Moosa, Rui Zhang, Wenpeng YinICLR 2024 · 13 citations
- On the Limitations of Cross-lingual Encoders as Exposed by Reference-Free Machine Translation EvaluationWei Zhao, Goran Glavas, Maxime Peyrard, Yang Gao et al.ACL 2020 · 53 citations
- Synchronous Speech Recognition and Speech-to-Text Translation with Interactive DecodingYuchen Liu, Jiajun Zhang, Hao Xiong, Long Zhou et al.AAAI 2020 · 73 citations
- Phone Features Improve Speech TranslationElizabeth Salesky, Alan W. BlackACL 2020 · 2 citations
