Isometric Regularization for Manifolds of Functional Data
Hyeongjun Heo, Seonghun Oh, Jae Yong Lee, Young Min Kim, Yonghyeon Lee
Abstract
While conventional data are represented as discrete vectors, Implicit Neural Representations (INRs) utilize neural networks to represent data points as continuous functions. By incorporating a shared network that maps latent vectors to individual functions, one can model the distribution of functional data, which has proven effective in many applications, such as learning 3D shapes, surface reflectance, and operators. However, the infinite-dimensional nature of these representations makes them prone to overfitting, necessitating sufficient regularization. Naïve regularization methods -those commonly used with discrete vector representations -may enforce smoothness to increase robustness but result in a loss of data fidelity due to improper handling of function coordinates. To overcome these challenges, we start by interpreting the mapping from latent variables to INRs as a parametrization of a Riemannian manifold. We then recognize that preserving geometric quantities -such as distances and angles -between the latent space and the data manifold is crucial. As a result, we obtain a manifold with minimal intrinsic curvature, leading to robust representations while maintaining high-quality data fitting. Our experiments on various data modalities demonstrate that our method effectively discovers a well-structured latent space, leading to robust data representations even for challenging datasets, such as those that are small or noisy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6a7a758d-8b35-4a8f-a8b7-a5e6e1bdc20eBuilds on18
- Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional DomainsMatthew Tancik, Pratul P. Srinivasan, Ben Mildenhall, Sara Fridovich-Keil et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 4,036 citations
- Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation FunctionsVincent Sitzmann, Julien N. P. Martel, Alexander W. Bergman, David B. Lindell et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 4,008 citations
- Implicit Geometric Regularization for Learning ShapesAmos Gropp, Lior Yariv, Niv Haim, Matan Atzmon et al.ICML 2020 · 1,001 citations
- VideoINR: Learning Video Implicit Neural Representation for Continuous Space-Time Super-ResolutionZeyuan Chen, Yinbo Chen, Jingwen Liu, Xingqian Xu et al.CVPR 2022 · 95 citations
- NeMF: Neural Motion Fields for Kinematic AnimationChengan He, Jun Saito, James Zachary, Holly E. Rushmeier et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 84 citations
Related papers
- Deep Learning on Implicit Neural Representations of ShapesLuca De Luigi, Adriano Cardace, Riccardo Spezialetti, Pierluigi Zama Ramirez et al.ICLR 2023 · 8 citations
- From data to functa: Your data point is a function and you can treat it like oneEmilien Dupont, Hyunjik Kim, S. M. Ali Eslami, Danilo Jimenez Rezende et al.ICML 2022 · 209 citations
- VI^3NR: Variance Informed Initialization for Implicit Neural RepresentationsChamin Hewa Koneputugodage, Yizhak Ben-Shabat, Sameera Ramasinghe, Stephen GouldCVPR 2025
- PIN: Prolate Spheroidal Wave Function-based Implicit Neural RepresentationsDhananjaya Jayasundara, Heng Zhao, Demetrio Labate, Vishal M. PatelICLR 2025
- Learning Smooth Neural Functions via Lipschitz RegularizationHsueh-Ti Derek Liu, Francis Williams, Alec Jacobson, Sanja Fidler et al.SIGGRAPH 2022 · 63 citations
