Fill in the Blanks: Empirical Analysis of the Privacy Threats of Browser Form Autofill
Xu Lin, Panagiotis Ilia, Jason Polakis
Abstract
Providing functionality that streamlines the more tedious aspects of website interaction is of paramount importance to browsers as it can significantly improve the overall user experience. Browsers' autofill functionality exemplifies this goal, as it alleviates the burden of repetitively typing the same information across websites. At the same time, however, it also presents a significant privacy risk due to the inherent disparity between the browser's interpretation of a given web page and what users can visually perceive. In this paper we present the first, to our knowledge, comprehensive exploration of the privacy threats of autofill functionality. We first develop a series of new techniques for concealing the presence of form elements that allow us to obtain sensitive user information while bypassing existing browser defenses. Alarmingly, our largescale study in the Alexa top 100K reveals the widespread use of such deceptive techniques for stealthily obtaining user-identifying information, as they are present in at least 5.8% of the forms that are autofilled by Chrome. Subsequently, our in-depth investigation of browsers' autofill functionality reveals a series of flaws and idiosyncrasies, which we exploit through a series of novel attack vectors that target specific aspects of browsers' behavior. By chaining these together we are able to demonstrate a novel invasive side-channel attack that exploits browser's autofill preview functionality for inferring sensitive information even when users choose to not utilize autofill. This attack affects all major Chromium-based browsers and allows attackers to probe users' autofill profiles for over a hundred thousand candidate values (e.g., credit card and phone numbers). Overall, while the preview mode is intended as a protective measure for enabling more informed decisions, ultimately it creates a new avenue of exposure that circumvents a user's choice to not divulge their information. In light of our findings, we have disclosed our techniques to the affected vendors, and have also created a Chrome extension that can prevent our attacks and mitigate this threat until our countermeasures are incorporated into browsers. CCS CONCEPTS • Security and privacy → Browser security.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6a6cd9a5-8217-48fa-97bf-156be88fa847Cited by top-tier papers15
- Sequential Recommendation via Stochastic Self-AttentionZiwei Fan, Zhiwei Liu, Yu Wang, Alice Wang et al.WWW 2022 · 203 citations
- Mutual Wasserstein Discrepancy Minimization for Sequential RecommendationZiwei Fan, Zhiwei Liu, Hao Peng, Philip S. YuWWW 2023 · 24 citations
- The Double Edged Sword: Identifying Authentication Pages and their Fingerprinting BehaviorAsuman Senol, Alisha Ukani, Dylan Cutler, Igor BilogrevicWWW 2024 · 14 citations
- Vault Raider: Stealthy UI-based Attacks Against Password Managers in Desktop EnvironmentsAndrea Infantino, Mir Masood Ali, Kostas Solomos, Jason PolakisNDSS 2026 · 1 citation
- Understanding Data Collection, Brokerage, and Spam in the Lead Marketing EcosystemYash Vekaria, Nurullah Demir, Konrad Kollnig, Zubair ShafiqS&P 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on11
- Online Tracking: A 1-million-site Measurement and AnalysisSteven Englehardt, Arvind NarayananCCS 2016 · 798 citations
- (Un)informed Consent: Studying GDPR Consent Notices in the FieldChristine Utz, Martin Degeling, Sascha Fahl, Florian Schaub et al.CCS 2019 · 429 citations
- Beauty and the Beast: Diverting Modern Web Browsers to Build Unique Browser FingerprintsPierre Laperdrix, Walter Rudametkin, Benoit BaudryS&P 2016 · 279 citations
- UI Dark Patterns and Where to Find Them: A Study on Mobile Applications and User PerceptionLinda Di Geronimo, Larissa Braz, Enrico Fregnan, Fabio Palomba et al.CHI 2020 · 262 citations
- (Cross-)Browser Fingerprinting via OS and Hardware Level FeaturesYinzhi Cao, Song Li, Erik WijmansNDSS 2017 · 199 citations
Related papers
- The Leaky Web: Automated Discovery of Cross-Site Information Leaks in Browsers and the WebJannis Rautenstrauch, Giancarlo Pellegrino, Ben StockS&P 2023
- Awakening the Web's Sleeper Agents: Misusing Service Workers for Privacy LeakageSoroush Karami, Panagiotis Ilia, Jason PolakisNDSS 2021
- Extension Breakdown: Security Analysis of Browsers Extension Resources Control PoliciesIskander Sánchez-Rola, Igor Santos, Davide BalzarottiUSENIX Security 2017 · 67 citations
- Checking Passwords on Leaky Computers: A Side Channel Analysis of Chrome's Password Leak Detect ProtocolAndrew Kwong, Walter Wang, Jason Kim, Jonathan Berger et al.USENIX Security 2023
- Pride and Prejudice in Progressive Web Apps: Abusing Native App-like Features in Web ApplicationsJiyeon Lee, Hayeon Kim, Junghwan Park, Insik Shin et al.CCS 2018 · 40 citations
