Learning in Non-Cooperative Configurable Markov Decision Processes
Giorgia Ramponi, Alberto Maria Metelli, Alessandro Concetti, Marcello Restelli
Abstract
The Configurable Markov Decision Process framework includes two entities: a Reinforcement Learning agent and a configurator that can modify some environmental parameters to improve the agent's performance. This presupposes that the two actors have identical reward functions. What if the configurator does not have the same intentions as the agent? This paper introduces the Non-Cooperative Configurable Markov Decision Process, a framework that allows modeling two (possibly different) reward functions for the configurator and the agent. Then, we consider an online learning problem, where the configurator has to find the best among a finite set of possible configurations. We propose two learning algorithms to minimize the configurator's expected regret, which exploit the problem's structure, depending on the agent's feedback. While a naïve application of the UCB algorithm yields a regret that grows indefinitely over time, we show that our approach suffers only bounded regret. Furthermore, we empirically validate the performance of our algorithm in simulated domains. ⇤ Work done when Giorgia Ramponi was at Politecnico di Milano. 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2021).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6a5d48ae-cfc8-48b3-8c5e-f7156589db7eCited by top-tier papers3
- Contextual Bilevel Reinforcement Learning for Incentive AlignmentVinzenz Thoma, Barna Pásztor, Andreas Krause, Giorgia Ramponi et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 21 citations
- Environment Design for Inverse Reinforcement LearningThomas Kleine Buening, Victor Villin, Christos DimitrakakisICML 2024 · 5 citations
- Learn to change the world: Multi-level reinforcement learning with model-changing actionsZiqing Lu, Babak Hassibi, Lifeng Lai, Weiyu XuICML 2026
Builds on5
- Provable Self-Play Algorithms for Competitive Reinforcement LearningYu Bai, Chi JinICML 2020 · 169 citations
- Near-Optimal Reinforcement Learning with Self-PlayYu Bai, Chi Jin, Tiancheng YuNeurIPS 2020 · 150 citations
- Model-Based Multi-Agent RL in Zero-Sum Markov Games with Near-Optimal Sample ComplexityKaiqing Zhang, Sham M. Kakade, Tamer Basar, Lin F. YangNeurIPS 2020 · 144 citations
- Learning to Play Sequential Games versus Unknown OpponentsPier Giuseppe Sessa, Ilija Bogunovic, Maryam Kamgarpour, Andreas KrauseNeurIPS 2020 · 34 citations
- Sequential Transfer in Reinforcement Learning with a Generative ModelAndrea Tirinzoni, Riccardo Poiani, Marcello RestelliICML 2020 · 26 citations
Related papers
- Online Markov Decision Processes Configuration with Continuous Decision SpaceDavide Maran, Pierriccardo Olivieri, Francesco Emanuele Stradi, Giuseppe Urso et al.AAAI 2024 · 3 citations
- Cooperative Online Learning in Stochastic and Adversarial MDPsTal Lancewicki, Aviv Rosenberg, Yishay MansourICML 2022 · 4 citations
- Online Learning in Unknown Markov GamesYi Tian, Yuanhao Wang, Tiancheng Yu, Suvrit SraICML 2021 · 48 citations
- Near-Optimal Regret for Adversarial MDP with Delayed Bandit FeedbackTiancheng Jin, Tal Lancewicki, Haipeng Luo, Yishay Mansour et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 29 citations
- Adaptive Model Design for Markov Decision ProcessSiyu Chen, Donglin Yang, Jiayang Li, Senmiao Wang et al.ICML 2022 · 14 citations
