The Hitchhiker's Guide to Facebook Web Tracking with Invisible Pixels and Click IDs
Paschalis Bekos, Panagiotis Papadopoulos, Evangelos P. Markatos, Nicolas Kourtellis
Abstract
Over the past years, advertisement companies have used various tracking methods to persistently track users across the web. Such tracking methods usually include first and third-party cookies, cookie synchronization, as well as a variety of fingerprinting mechanisms. Facebook (FB) (now Meta) recently introduced a new tagging mechanism that attaches a one-time tag as a URL parameter (namely FBCLID) on outgoing links to other websites. Although such a tag does not seem to have enough information to persistently track users, we demonstrate that despite its ephemeral nature, when combined with FB Pixel, it can aid in persistently monitoring user browsing behavior across i) different websites, ii) different actions on each website, iii) time, i.e., both in the past as well as in the future. We refer to this online monitoring of users as FB web tracking. We find that FB Pixel tracks a wide range of user activities on websites with alarming detail, especially on websites classified as sensitive categories under GDPR. Also, we show how the FBCLID tag can be used to match, and thus de-anonymize, activities of online users performed in the distant past (even before those users had a FB account) tracked by FB Pixel. In fact, by combining this tag with cookies that have rolling expiration dates, FB can also keep track of users' browsing activities in the future as well. Our experimental results suggest that 23% of the 10k most popular websites have adopted this technology, and can contribute to this activity tracking on the web. Furthermore, our longitudinal study shows that this type of user activity tracking can go as far back as 2015. ). Simply said, if a user creates for the first time a FB account today, FB could, under some conditions, match their anonymously collected past web browsing activity to their newly created FB profile, from as far back as 2015 and continue tracking their activity in the future.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers6
- PURL: Safe and Effective Sanitization of Link DecorationShaoor Munir, Patrick Lee, Umar Iqbal, Sandra Deepthy Siby et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 9 citations
- A Study of GDPR Compliance under the Transparency and Consent FrameworkMichael Smith, Antonio Torres-Agüero, Riley Grossman, Pritam Sen et al.WWW 2024 · 9 citations
- Bridges to Self: Silent Web-to-App Tracking on Mobile via LocalhostTim Vlummens, Aniketh Girish, Nipuna Weerasekara, Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius et al.USENIX Security 2026
- PIIxel Leaks: Passive Identification of Personally Identifiable Information Leakage through Meta PixelPaschalis Bekos, Panagiotis Papadopoulos, Nicolas Kourtellis, Michalis PolychronakisCCS 2025
- A Comparative Study of News Exposure and Consumption On and Off FacebookNardjes Amieur, Salim Chouaki, Oana Goga, Beatrice RoussillonCSCW 2025
Builds on13
- Tranco: A Research-Oriented Top Sites Ranking Hardened Against ManipulationVictor Le Pochat, Tom van Goethem, Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob, Maciej Korczynski et al.NDSS 2019 · 826 citations
- Online Tracking: A 1-million-site Measurement and AnalysisSteven Englehardt, Arvind NarayananCCS 2016 · 798 citations
- (Un)informed Consent: Studying GDPR Consent Notices in the FieldChristine Utz, Martin Degeling, Sascha Fahl, Florian Schaub et al.CCS 2019 · 429 citations
- Internet Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Trackers: An Archaeological Study of Web Tracking from 1996 to 2016Ada Lerner, Anna Kornfeld Simpson, Tadayoshi Kohno, Franziska RoesnerUSENIX Security 2016 · 273 citations
- Do Cookie Banners Respect my Choice? : Measuring Legal Compliance of Banners from IAB Europe's Transparency and Consent FrameworkCélestin Matte, Nataliia Bielova, Cristiana Teixeira SantosS&P 2020 · 212 citations
Related papers
- The First Early Evidence of the Use of Browser Fingerprinting for Online TrackingZengrui Liu, Jimmy Dani, Yinzhi Cao, Shujiang Wu et al.WWW 2025 · 7 citations
- Detecting and Measuring gclid-Based Tracking on the WebHuy Pham, Kensuke Fukuda, Ha DaoCCS 2026
- FP-STALKER: Tracking Browser Fingerprint EvolutionsAntoine Vastel, Pierre Laperdrix, Walter Rudametkin, Romain RouvoyS&P 2018 · 117 citations
- TGNN: Enhancing Pixel Tracking Detection via LLM-driven Annotation and GAT-powered Structural RepresentationShenping Xiong, Xutong Wang, Ze Jin, Xinyu Liu et al.WWW 2026
- Tales of Favicons and Caches: Persistent Tracking in Modern BrowsersKonstantinos Solomos, John Kristoff, Chris Kanich, Jason PolakisNDSS 2021
