Foreseeing Reconstruction Quality of Gradient Inversion: An Optimization Perspective
Hyeong Gwon Hong, Yooshin Cho, Hanbyel Cho, Jaesung Ahn, Junmo Kim
Abstract
Gradient inversion attacks can leak data privacy when clients share weight updates with the server in federated learning (FL). Existing studies mainly use L2 or cosine distance as the loss function for gradient matching in the attack. Our empirical investigation shows that the vulnerability ranking varies with the loss function used. Gradient norm, which is commonly used as a vulnerability proxy for gradient inversion attack, cannot explain this as it remains constant regardless of the loss function for gradient matching. In this paper, we propose a loss-aware vulnerability proxy (LAVP) for the first time. LAVP refers to either the maximum or minimum eigenvalue of the Hessian with respect to gradient matching loss at ground truth. This suggestion is based on our theoretical findings regarding the local optimization of the gradient inversion in proximity to the ground truth, which corresponds to the worst case attack scenario. We demonstrate the effectiveness of LAVP on various architectures and datasets, showing its consistent superiority over the gradient norm in capturing sample vulnerabilities. The performance of each proxy is measured in terms of Spearman's rank correlation with respect to several similarity scores. This work will contribute to enhancing FL security against any potential loss functions beyond L2 or cosine distance in the future.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 699c2aaf-c6d4-426c-b216-d79b57a252b7Builds on9
- Inverting Gradients - How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?Jonas Geiping, Hartmut Bauermeister, Hannah Dröge, Michael MoellerNeurIPS 2020 · 1,822 citations
- Gradient Inversion with Generative Image PriorJinwoo Jeon, Jaechang Kim, Kangwook Lee, Sewoong Oh et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 216 citations
- Label Leakage and Protection in Two-party Split LearningOscar Li, Jiankai Sun, Xin Yang, Weihao Gao et al.ICLR 2022 · 170 citations
- R-GAP: Recursive Gradient Attack on PrivacyJunyi Zhu, Matthew B. BlaschkoICLR 2021 · 157 citations
- Cocktail Party Attack: Breaking Aggregation-Based Privacy in Federated Learning Using Independent Component AnalysisSanjay Kariyappa, Chuan Guo, Kiwan Maeng, Wenjie Xiong et al.ICML 2023 · 43 citations
Related papers
- Gradient Inversion Attacks Beyond SGDGuangnian Wan, Gongfan Fang, Xinyin Ma, Xinchao WangICML 2026
- Evaluating Gradient Inversion Attacks and Defenses in Federated LearningYangsibo Huang, Samyak Gupta, Zhao Song, Kai Li et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 419 citations
- Cracking Federated Privacy: Initialization-Resilient Gradient Inversion with Fine-Grained ReconstructionKaiming Zhu, Jinsheng Yang, Siyang Guo, Huaqian Qin et al.USENIX Security 2026
- Surrogate Model Extension (SME): A Fast and Accurate Weight Update Attack on Federated LearningJunyi Zhu, Ruicong Yao, Matthew B. BlaschkoICML 2023 · 17 citations
- Protect Privacy from Gradient Leakage Attack in Federated LearningJunxiao Wang, Song Guo, Xin Xie, Heng QiINFOCOM 2022 · 82 citations
