Artemis: Structured Visual Reasoning for Perception Policy Learning
Wei Tang, Yanpeng Sun, Shan Zhang, Weihao Bo, Xiaofan Li, Piotr Koniusz, Wei Li, Na Zhao, Zechao Li
Abstract
Recent reinforcement-learning frameworks for visual perception policy usually incorporate intermediate reasoning chains expressed in natural language. Empirical observations indicate that such purely linguistic intermediate reasoning often reduces performance on perception tasks. We argue that the core issue lies not in reasoning per se but in the form of reasoning: while these chains perform semantic reasoning in an unstructured linguistic space, visual perception requires reasoning in a spatial and object-centric space. In response, we introduce Artemis, a perception-policy learning method that performs structured visual reasoning, where each intermediate step is represented as a (label, bounding-box) pair capturing a verifiable visual state. This design enables explicit tracking of intermediate states, direct supervision for proposal quality, and avoids ambiguity introduced by language-based reasoning. Building upon verifiable and spatially grounded reasoning chains, Artemis provides a unified architecture for diverse perceptual tasks, without requiring the task-specific designs relied upon by prior perceptual policy models. Trained using grounding and detection sampeles in natural image domains, Artemis generalizes to counting and geometric perception tasks. At its core, a spatially grounded, object-centric chain rule provides a principled foundation for scalable and general perceptual policies.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6932f920-1acc-48c4-9629-26895ce39cc8Builds on22
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated CapabilitiesWeihao Yu, Zhengyuan Yang, Linjie Li, Jianfeng Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 1,191 citations
- OFA: Unifying Architectures, Tasks, and Modalities Through a Simple Sequence-to-Sequence Learning FrameworkPeng Wang, An Yang, Rui Men, Junyang Lin et al.ICML 2022 · 1,058 citations
Related papers
- VisRL: Intention-Driven Visual Perception via Reinforced ReasoningZhangquan Chen, Xufang Luo, Dongsheng LiICCV 2025 · 2 citations
- Visual Attention Reasoning via Hierarchical Search and Self-VerificationWei Cai, Jian Zhao, Yuchen Yuan, Tianle Zhang et al.ACL 2026
- VisionReasoner: Unified Reasoning-Integrated Visual Perception via Reinforcement LearningYuqi Liu, Tianyuan Qu, Zhisheng Zhong, Bohao Peng et al.ICLR 2026 · 15 citations
- No Labels, No Problem: Training Visual Reasoners with Multimodal VerifiersDamiano Marsili, Georgia GkioxariICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- E-ViC: Reasoning Beyond Text via Embodied Visual Chain for Spatial IntelligenceJunbo Qi, Yi Zhang, Hanchu Ni, Che Liu et al.ACL 2026
