AICrypto: Evaluating Cryptography Capabilities of Large Language Models
Yu Wang, Yijian Liu, Liheng Ji, Han Luo, Wenjie Li, Xiaofei Zhou, Chiyun Feng, Puji Wang, Yuhan Cao, Geyuan Zhang, Xiaojian Li, Rongwu Xu
Abstract
We build AICrypto, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the cryptography capabilities of large language models (LLMs). The benchmark comprises 135 multiple-choice questions, 150 capture-the-flag challenges, and 30 proof problems, covering a broad range of skills from knowledge memorization to vulnerability exploitation and formal reasoning. All tasks are carefully reviewed or constructed by cryptography experts to improve correctness and rigor. For each proof problem, we provide detailed scoring rubrics and reference solutions that enable automated grading, achieving high correlation with human expert evaluations. We introduce strong human expert performance baselines for comparison across all task types. Our evaluation of 17 leading LLMs reveals that state-ofthe-art models match or even surpass human experts in memorizing cryptographic concepts, exploiting common vulnerabilities, and routine proofs. However, our analysis reveals that they still lack a deep understanding of abstract mathematical concepts and struggle with tasks that require multi-step reasoning and dynamic analysis. We hope this work could provide insights for future research on LLMs in cryptographic applications. Our code and dataset are available at https://github.com/wangyu-ovo/aicrypto-agent . * Equal contribution.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 68e77926-502c-4718-bed8-96820e0ce671Builds on11
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Cryptanalytic Extraction of Neural Network ModelsNicholas Carlini, Matthew Jagielski, Ilya MironovCRYPTO 2020 · 109 citations
- Covert Malicious Finetuning: Challenges in Safeguarding LLM AdaptationDanny Halawi, Alexander Wei, Eric Wallace, Tony Tong Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 77 citations
- SalsaPicante: A Machine Learning Attack on LWE with Binary SecretsCathy Yuanchen Li, Jana Sotáková, Emily Wenger, Mohamed Malhou et al.CCS 2023 · 11 citations
- Polynomial Time Cryptanalytic Extraction of Deep Neural Networks in the Hard-Label SettingNicholas Carlini, Jorge Chávez-Saab, Anna Hambitzer, Francisco Rodríguez-Henríquez et al.EUROCRYPT 2025 · 10 citations
Related papers
- CrypFormBench: Benchmarking Formal Analysis Capability of Large Language Models for Cryptographic SchemesZhaoxuan Li, Qionglu Zhang, Hengyuan Liu, Xiaoyan Gu et al.FSE 2026 · 1 citation
- The Decrypto Benchmark for Multi-Agent Reasoning and Theory of MindAndrei Lupu, Timon Willi, Jakob FoersterICML 2026 · 2 citations
- DOMAINEVAL: An Auto-Constructed Benchmark for Multi-Domain Code GenerationQiming Zhu, Jialun Cao, Yaojie Lu, Hongyu Lin et al.AAAI 2025 · 25 citations
- Reliable Fine-Grained Evaluation of Natural Language Math ProofsWenjie Ma, Andrei Cojocaru, Neel Kolhe, Haihan Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 14 citations
- LawBench: Benchmarking Legal Knowledge of Large Language ModelsZhiwei Fei, Xiaoyu Shen, Dawei Zhu, Fengzhe Zhou et al.EMNLP 2024 · 59 citations
