A constant rate non-malleable code in the split-state model
Divesh Aggarwal, Maciej Obremski
Abstract
Non-malleable codes, introduced by Dziembowski, Pietrzak and Wichs in ICS 2010, have emerged in the last few years as a fundamental object at the intersection of cryptography and coding theory. Non-malleable codes provide a useful message integrity guarantee in situations where traditional error-correction (and even error-detection) is impossible; for example, when the attacker can completely overwrite the encoded message. Informally, a code is non-malleable if the message contained in a modified codeword is either the original message, or a completely “unrelated value”. The family which received the most attention is the family of tampering functions in the so called (2-part) split-state model: here the message x is encoded into two shares L and R, and the attacker is allowed to arbitrarily tamper with each L and R individually. In this work, we give a constant rate non-malleable code from the tampering family containing so called 2-lookahead functions and forgetful functions, and combined with the work of Dodis, Kazana and the authors from STOC 2015, this gives the first constant rate non-malleable code in the split-state model with negligible error. The full version of this paper can be found here: https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/1299.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 68db957d-b409-4d13-8800-e6c3667c0215Cited by top-tier papers5
- Two Source Extractors for Asymptotically Optimal Entropy, and (Many) MoreXin LiFOCS 2023 · 20 citations
- Rate one-third non-malleable codesDivesh Aggarwal, Bhavana Kanukurthi, Sai Lakshmi Bhavana Obbattu, Maciej Obremski et al.STOC 2022 · 14 citations
- Non-malleability Against Polynomial TamperingMarshall Ball, Eshan Chattopadhyay, Jyun-Jie Liao, Tal Malkin et al.CRYPTO 2020 · 9 citations
- (Nondeterministic) Hardness vs. Non-malleabilityMarshall Ball, Dana Dachman-Soled, Julian LossCRYPTO 2022 · 7 citations
- Extractors: Low Entropy Requirements Colliding with Non-malleabilityDivesh Aggarwal, Eldon Chung, Maciej ObremskiCRYPTO 2023 · 1 citation
Related papers
- Practical Non-Malleable Codes from l-more Extractable Hash FunctionsAggelos Kiayias, Feng-Hao Liu, Yiannis TselekounisCCS 2016 · 40 citations
- Non-malleable Codes for Bounded Parallel-Time TamperingDana Dachman-Soled, Ilan Komargodski, Rafael PassCRYPTO 2021 · 11 citations
- Non-malleable Codes with Optimal Rate for Poly-Size CircuitsMarshall Ball, Ronen Shaltiel, Jad SilbakEUROCRYPT 2024 · 4 citations
- Multi-source Non-malleable Extractors and ApplicationsVipul Goyal, Akshayaram Srinivasan, Chenzhi ZhuEUROCRYPT 2021 · 14 citations
- Non-malleable Secret Sharing Against Bounded Joint-Tampering Attacks in the Plain ModelGianluca Brian, Antonio Faonio, Maciej Obremski, Mark Simkin et al.CRYPTO 2020 · 17 citations
