VF-PS: How to Select Important Participants in Vertical Federated Learning, Efficiently and Securely?
Jiawei Jiang, Lukas Burkhalter, Fangcheng Fu, Bolin Ding, Bo Du, Anwar Hithnawi, Bo Li, Ce Zhang
Abstract
Vertical Federated Learning (VFL), that trains federated models over vertically partitioned data, has emerged as an important learning paradigm. However, existing VFL methods are facing two challenges: (1) scalability when # participants grows to even modest scale and (2) diminishing return w.r.t. # participants: not all participants are equally important and many will not introduce quality improvement in a large consortium. Inspired by these two challenges, in this paper, we ask: How can we select l out of m participants, where l ≪ m , that are most important? We call this problem Vertically Federated Participant Selection , and model it with a principled mutual information-based view. Our first technical contribution is VF-MINE—a Vertically Federated Mutual INformation Estimator —that uses one of the most celebrated algorithms in database theory—Fagin’s algorithm as a building block. Our second contribution is to further optimize VF-MINE to enable VF-PS, a group testing-based participant selection framework. We empirically show that vertically federated participation selection can be orders of magnitude faster than training a full-fledged VFL model, while being able to identify the most important subset of participants that often lead to a VFL model of similar quality.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- VertiBench: Advancing Feature Distribution Diversity in Vertical Federated Learning BenchmarksZhaomin Wu, Junyi Hou, Bingsheng HeICLR 2024 · 7 citations
- Reinforcement Active Client Selection for Federated Heterogeneous Graph LearningJia Wang, Yawen Li, Yingxia Shao, Zhe Xue et al.AAAI 2025 · 6 citations
- Hounding Data Diversity: Towards Participant Selection in Vertical Federated LearningXiaokai Zhou, Xiao Yan, Fangcheng Fu, Xinyan Li et al.ICDE 2025 · 1 citation
- SPMC: Self-Purifying Federated Backdoor Defense via Margin ContributionWenwen He, Wenke Huang, Bin Yang, Shukan Liu et al.ICML 2025
Builds on8
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine LearningKallista A. Bonawitz, Vladimir Ivanov, Ben Kreuter, Antonio Marcedone et al.CCS 2017 · 3,936 citations
- SecureML: A System for Scalable Privacy-Preserving Machine LearningPayman Mohassel, Yupeng ZhangS&P 2017 · 2,107 citations
- Privacy Preserving Vertical Federated Learning for Tree-based ModelsYuncheng Wu, Shaofeng Cai, Xiaokui Xiao, Gang Chen et al.VLDB 2020 · 259 citations
- Efficient Private Statistics with Succinct SketchesLuca Melis, George Danezis, Emiliano De CristofaroNDSS 2016 · 128 citations
Related papers
- PS-MI: Accurate, Efficient, and Private Data Valuation in Vertical Federated LearningXiaokai Zhou, Xiao Yan, Fangcheng Fu, Ziwen Fu et al.VLDB 2025
- FEAST: A Communication-efficient Federated Feature Selection Framework for Relational DataRui Fu, Yuncheng Wu, Quanqing Xu, Meihui ZhangSIGMOD 2023 · 17 citations
- FedSDG-FS: Efficient and Secure Feature Selection for Vertical Federated LearningAnran Li, Hongyi Peng, Lan Zhang, Jiahui Huang et al.INFOCOM 2023 · 50 citations
- Efficient Participant Contribution Evaluation for Horizontal and Vertical Federated LearningJunhao Wang, Lan Zhang, Anran Li, Xuanke You et al.ICDE 2022 · 40 citations
- Vertical Federated Feature ScreeningHuajun Yin, Liyuan Wang, Yingqiu Zhu, Liping Zhu et al.NeurIPS 2025
