Tracing Knowledge State with Individual Cognition and Acquisition Estimation
Ting Long, Yunfei Liu, Jian Shen, Weinan Zhang, Yong Yu
Abstract
Knowledge tracing, which dynamically estimates students' learning states by predicting their performance on answering questions, is an essential task in online education. One typical solution for knowledge tracing is based on Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), which represent students' knowledge states with the hidden states of RNNs. Such type of methods normally assumes that students have the same cognition level and knowledge acquisition sensitivity on the same question. Thus, they (i) predict students' responses by referring to their knowledge states and question representations, and (ii) update the knowledge states according to the question representations and students' responses. No explicit cognition level or knowledge acquisition sensitivity is considered in the above two processes. However, in real-world scenarios, students have different understandings on a question and have various knowledge acquisition after they finish the same question. In this paper, we propose a novel model called Individual Estimation Knowledge Tracing (IEKT), which estimates the students' cognition on the question before response prediction and assesses their knowledge acquisition sensitivity on the questions before updating the knowledge state. In the experiments, we compare IEKT with 11 knowledge tracing baselines on four benchmark datasets, and the results show IEKT achieves the state-of-the-art performance.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 68cbfd9e-41de-467f-ac4d-b460fb768482Cited by top-tier papers9
- Assessing Student's Dynamic Knowledge State by Exploring the Question Difficulty EffectShuanghong Shen, Zhenya Huang, Qi Liu, Yu Su et al.SIGIR 2022 · 114 citations
- Learning Behavior-oriented Knowledge TracingBihan Xu, Zhenya Huang, Jiayu Liu, Shuanghong Shen et al.KDD 2023 · 55 citations
- simpleKT: A Simple But Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Knowledge TracingZitao Liu, Qiongqiong Liu, Jiahao Chen, Shuyan Huang et al.ICLR 2023 · 23 citations
- DyGKT: Dynamic Graph Learning for Knowledge TracingKe Cheng, Linzhi Peng, Pengyang Wang, Junchen Ye et al.KDD 2024 · 19 citations
- A Robust Computerized Adaptive Testing Approach in Educational Question RetrievalYan Zhuang, Qi Liu, Zhenya Huang, Zhi Li et al.SIGIR 2022 · 17 citations
Related papers
- Deep Attentive Model for Knowledge TracingXinping Wang, Liangyu Chen, Min ZhangAAAI 2023 · 10 citations
- Learning Process-consistent Knowledge TracingShuanghong Shen, Qi Liu, Enhong Chen, Zhenya Huang et al.KDD 2021 · 149 citations
- Interpretable Knowledge Tracing with Multiscale State RepresentationJianwen Sun, Fenghua Yu, Qian Wan, Qing Li et al.WWW 2024 · 41 citations
- Question Difficulty Consistent Knowledge TracingGuimei Liu, Huijing Zhan, Jung-Jae KimWWW 2024 · 23 citations
- Remembering is Not Applying: Interpretable Knowledge Tracing for Problem-solving ProcessesTao Huang, Xinjia Ou, Huali Yang, Shengze Hu et al.ACM MM 2024 · 6 citations
