Spike Distance Function as a Learning Objective for Spike Prediction
Kevin Doran, Marvin Seifert, Carola A. M. Yovanovich, Tom Baden
Abstract
Approaches to predicting neuronal spike responses commonly use a Poisson learning objective. This objective quantizes responses into spike counts within a fixed summation interval, typically on the order of 10 to 100 milliseconds in duration; however, neuronal responses are often time accurate down to a few milliseconds, and Poisson models struggle to precisely model them at these timescales. We propose the concept of a spike distance function that maps points in time to the temporal distance to the nearest spike. We show that neural networks can be trained to approximate spike distance functions, and we present an efficient algorithm for inferring spike trains from the outputs of these models. Using recordings of chicken and frog retinal ganglion cells responding to visual stimuli, we compare the performance of our approach to that of Poisson models trained with various summation intervals. We show that our approach outperforms the use of Poisson models at spike train inference.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 68aed54f-5abf-4880-a542-d12bf25573b1Builds on5
- A ConvNet for the 2020sZhuang Liu, Hanzi Mao, Chao-Yuan Wu, Christoph Feichtenhofer et al.CVPR 2022 · 6,782 citations
- Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical PrecipiceRishabh Agarwal, Max Schwarzer, Pablo Samuel Castro, Aaron C. Courville et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,067 citations
- Light Field Networks: Neural Scene Representations with Single-Evaluation RenderingVincent Sitzmann, Semon Rezchikov, Bill Freeman, Josh Tenenbaum et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 426 citations
- Bayesian nonparametric (non-)renewal processes for analyzing neural spike train variabilityDavid Liu, Máté LengyelNeurIPS 2023 · 2 citations
- ConvNeXt V2: Co-designing and Scaling ConvNets with Masked AutoencodersSanghyun Woo, Shoubhik Debnath, Ronghang Hu, Xinlei Chen et al.CVPR 2023
Related papers
- Rescuing neural spike train models from bad MLEDiego M. Arribas, Yuan Zhao, Il Memming ParkNeurIPS 2020 · 11 citations
- Exploring Loss Functions for Time-based Training Strategy in Spiking Neural NetworksYaoyu Zhu, Wei Fang, Xiaodong Xie, Tiejun Huang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 26 citations
- Neural Clustering ProcessesAri Pakman, Yueqi Wang, Catalin Mitelut, Jin Hyung Lee et al.ICML 2020 · 28 citations
- Temporal Conditioning Spiking Latent Variable Models of the Neural Response to Natural Visual ScenesGehua Ma, Runhao Jiang, Rui Yan, Huajin TangNeurIPS 2023 · 8 citations
- Differentiable Spike: Rethinking Gradient-Descent for Training Spiking Neural NetworksYuhang Li, Yufei Guo, Shanghang Zhang, Shikuang Deng et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 288 citations
