Guaranteeing Knowledge Integration with Joint Decoding for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Zhengyi Zhao, Shubo Zhang, Zezhong Wang, Yuxi Zhang, Huimin Wang, Yutian Zhao, Yefeng Zheng, Binyang Li, Kam-Fai Wong, Xian Wu
Abstract
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) significantly enhances Large Language Models (LLMs) by providing access to external knowledge. However, current research primarily focuses on retrieval quality, often overlooking the critical''integration bottleneck'': even when relevant documents are retrieved, LLMs frequently fail to utilize them effectively due to conflicts with their internal parametric knowledge. In this paper, we argue that implicitly resolving this conflict in a single generation pass is suboptimal. We introduce GuarantRAG, a framework that explicitly decouples reasoning from evidence integration. First, we generate an''Inner-Answer''based solely on parametric knowledge to capture the model's reasoning flow. Second, to guarantee faithful evidence extraction, we generate a''Refer-Answer''using a novel Contrastive DPO objective. This objective treats the parametric Inner-Answer as a negative constraint and the retrieved documents as positive ground truth, forcing the model to suppress internal hallucinations in favor of external evidence during this phase. Finally, rather than naive concatenation or using the DPO trained model directly, we propose a joint decoding mechanism that dynamically fuses the logical coherence of the Inner-Answer with the factual precision of the Refer-Answer at the token level. Experiments on five QA benchmarks demonstrate that GuarantRAG improves accuracy by up to 12.1% and reduces hallucinations by 16.3% compared to standard and dynamic RAG baselines.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 687540fc-60e8-410a-8e76-a5c346d44c99Builds on4
- Active Retrieval Augmented GenerationZhengbao Jiang, Frank F. Xu, Luyu Gao, Zhiqing Sun et al.EMNLP 2023 · 315 citations
- Precise Zero-Shot Dense Retrieval without Relevance LabelsLuyu Gao, Xueguang Ma, Jimmy Lin, Jamie CallanACL 2023 · 211 citations
- Understand What LLM Needs: Dual Preference Alignment for Retrieval-Augmented GenerationGuanting Dong, Yutao Zhu, Chenghao Zhang, Zechen Wang et al.WWW 2025 · 44 citations
- Grow-and-Clip: Informative-yet-Concise Evidence Distillation for Answer ExplanationYuyan Chen, Yanghua Xiao, Bang LiuICDE 2022 · 1 citation
Related papers
- DVD: Dynamic Contrastive Decoding for Knowledge Amplification in Multi-Document Question AnsweringJing Jin, Houfeng Wang, Hao Zhang, Xiaoguang Li et al.EMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- Conflict-Aware RAG: Multi-Stage Learning with Conflict Signals for Robust Retrieval-Augmented GenerationHaiyan Wu, Chenchen Wang, Chaoqun Sun, Chengxiong Lu et al.WWW 2026
- Bridging External and Parametric Knowledge: Mitigating Hallucination of LLMs with Shared-Private Semantic Synergy in Dual-Stream KnowledgeYi Sui, Chaozhuo Li, Chen Zhang, Dawei Song et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- RetroLLM: Empowering Large Language Models to Retrieve Fine-grained Evidence within GenerationXiaoxi Li, Jiajie Jin, Yujia Zhou, Yongkang Wu et al.ACL 2025
- Empowering GraphRAG with Knowledge Filtering and IntegrationKai Guo, Harry Shomer, Shenglai Zeng, Haoyu Han et al.EMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
