Lune

ICML2023Top-tier venue

On the Statistical Benefits of Temporal Difference Learning

David Cheikhi, Daniel Russo

2023Year
6Citations
6Top-tier citations

Abstract

Given a dataset on actions and resulting long-term rewards, a direct estimation approach fits value functions that minimize prediction error on the training data. Temporal difference learning (TD) methods instead fit value functions by minimizing the degree of temporal inconsistency between estimates made at successive time-steps. Focusing on finite state Markov chains, we provide a crisp asymptotic theory of the statistical advantages of this approach. First, we show that an intuitive inverse trajectory pooling coefficient completely characterizes the percent reduction in mean-squared error of value estimates. Depending on problem structure, the reduction could be enormous or nonexistent. Next, we prove that there can be dramatic improvements in estimates of the difference in value-to-go for two states: TD's errors are bounded in terms of a novel measure -the problem's trajectory crossing time -which can be much smaller than the problem's time horizon. 1. The relative benefits of TD are determined by a natural 'inverse trajectory pooling coefficient.' TD uses value-to-go at intermediate states as a surrogate (Athey et al., 2019; Prentice, 1989) .

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 6849bb2b-ae2c-4a07-b8db-4ac3ba7424a7

Cited by top-tier papers6

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on2

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines