Learning from Evolving Training Dynamics: An Entropy-Maximizing Data Curation Strategy for LLM Supervised Post-Training
Mengxiang Zhang, Lingyuan Liu
Abstract
Supervised post-training is essential for refining Large Language Models (LLMs), yet its effectiveness relies heavily on strategic data curation. Traditional Curriculum Learning (CL) strategies often fail to account for the evolving proficiency of the learner, relying instead on static, single dimensional metrics. We propose EVO-Curate, a dynamic data curation framework that synchronizes sample complexity with the maturing capacity of the LLM. EVO-Curate employs an Adaptive Dynamics Measurer to synthesize instantaneous difficulty and historical variability into a multidimensional utility score. To maintain representational diversity, we introduce an Evolutionary Sampling Scheduler based on an entropy maximizing mechanism. Empirical evaluations across instruction following, mathematical reasoning, and code generation demonstrate that EVO-Curate consistently outperforms standard training baselines and traditional CL methods across various architectures and scales. Specifically, our framework achieves relative performance gains of up to about 10% while maintaining manageable computational overhead. These results establish EVO-Curate as a scalable and model agnostic solution for enhancing the efficiency of modern LLM training pipelines.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 68299707-9fb5-4dec-a377-5012221bdfe5Builds on25
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code GenerationJiawei Liu, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Yuyao Wang, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2023 · 2,317 citations
- LIMA: Less Is More for AlignmentChunting Zhou, Pengfei Liu, Puxin Xu, Srinivasan Iyer et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,486 citations
Related papers
- EDCO: Dynamic Curriculum Orchestration for Domain-specific Large Language Model Fine-tuningJing-Cheng Pang, Sun Liu, Chang Zhou, Xian Tang et al.ICML 2026
- Rethinking Data Curation in LLM Training: Online Reweighting Offers Better Generalization than Offline MethodsWanru Zhao, Yihong Chen, Yuzhi Tang, Wentao Ma et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- What Makes a Good Curriculum? Disentangling the Effects of Data Ordering on LLM Mathematical ReasoningYaning Jia, Chunhui Zhang, Xingjian Diao, Xiangchi Yuan et al.ACL 2026 · 4 citations
- Distribution-Value Coevolution for Adaptive RLHF Data SchedulingZairun Yang, Yanbo Yang, Chenyi Zhou, Xinyu Guan et al.KDD 2026
- Boosting Multi-Domain Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models through Evolving Interactions between SamplesXize Liang, Lin Yang, Jie Wang, Yiyang Lu et al.ICML 2025
