Safety Alignment of Large Language Models via Contrasting Safe and Harmful Distributions
Xiaoyun Zhang, Zhengyue Zhao, Wenxuan Shi, Kaidi Xu, Di Huang, Xing Hu
Abstract
With the widespread application of Large Language Models (LLMs), it has become a significant concern to ensure their safety and prevent harmful responses. While current safe-alignment methods based on instruction fine-tuning and Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) can effectively reduce harmful responses from LLMs, they often require high-quality datasets and heavy computational overhead during model training. Another way to align language models is to modify the logit of tokens in model outputs without heavy training. Recent studies have shown that contrastive decoding can enhance the performance of language models by reducing the likelihood of confused tokens. However, these methods require the manual selection of contrastive models or instruction templates, limiting the degree of contrast. To this end, we propose Adversarial Contrastive Decoding (ACD), an optimization-based framework to generate two opposite soft system prompts, the Safeguarding Prompt (SP) and the Adversarial Prompt (AP), for prompt-based contrastive decoding. The SP aims to promote safer outputs while the AP aims to exploit the harmful parts of the model, providing a strong contrast to align the model with safety. ACD only needs to apply a lightweight prompt tuning on a rather small anchor dataset without training the target model. Experiments conducted on extensive models and benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed method achieves much better safety performance than previous model training-free decoding methods without sacrificing its original generation ability.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6812bcec-22c4-4d0f-bdfc-2fd378bd88c5Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on26
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMsTim Dettmers, Artidoro Pagnoni, Ari Holtzman, Luke ZettlemoyerNeurIPS 2023 · 5,863 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?Alexander Wei, Nika Haghtalab, Jacob SteinhardtNeurIPS 2023 · 2,230 citations
- Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!Xiangyu Qi, Yi Zeng, Tinghao Xie, Pin-Yu Chen et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,104 citations
Related papers
- Please refuse to answer me! Mitigating Over-Refusal in Large Language Models via Adaptive Contrastive DecodingYupeng Qi, Ziyu Lyu, Lixin Cui, Lu Bai et al.ACL 2026
- DeAL: Decoding-time Alignment for Large Language ModelsJames Y. Huang, Sailik Sengupta, Daniele Bonadiman, Yi-An Lai et al.ACL 2025
- Navigating the OverKill in Large Language ModelsChenyu Shi, Xiao Wang, Qiming Ge, Songyang Gao et al.ACL 2024
- Discern Truth from Falsehood: Reducing Over-Refusal via Contrastive RefinementYuxiao Lu, Lin Xu, Yang Sun, Wenjun Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- CARE: Decoding-Time Safety Alignment via Rollback and Introspection InterventionXiaomeng Hu, Fei Huang, Chenhan Yuan, Junyang Lin et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
