Divide-Solve-Combine: An Interpretable and Accurate Prompting Framework for Zero-shot Multi-Intent Detection
Libo Qin, Qiguang Chen, Jingxuan Zhou, Jin Wang, Hao Fei, Wanxiang Che, Min Li
Abstract
Zero-shot multi-intent detection is capable of capturing multiple intents within a single utterance without any training data, which gains increasing attention. Building on the success of large language models (LLM), dominant approaches in the literature explore prompting techniques to enable zero-shot multi-intent detection. While significant advancements have been witnessed, the existing prompting approaches still face two major issues: lacking explicit reasoning and lacking interpretability. Therefore, in this paper, we introduce a Divide-Solve-Combine Prompting (DSCP) to address the above issues. Specifically, DSCP explicitly decomposes multi-intent detection into three components including (1) single-intent division prompting is utilized to decompose an input query into distinct sub-sentences, each containing a single intent; (2) intent-by-intent solution prompting is applied to solve each sub-sentence recurrently; and (3) multi-intent combination prompting is employed for combining each sub-sentence result to obtain the final multi-intent result. By decomposition, DSCP allows the model to track the explicit reasoning process and improve the interpretability. In addition, we propose an interactive divide-solve-combine prompting (Inter-DSCP) to naturally capture the interaction capabilities of large language models. Experimental results on two standard multi-intent benchmarks (i.e., MixATIS and MixSNIPS) reveal that both DSCP and Inter-DSCP obtain substantial improvements over baselines, achieving superior performance and higher interpretability.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- ODUTQA-MDC: A Task for Open-Domain Underspecified Tabular QA with Multi-turn Dialogue-based ClarificationZhensheng Wang, ZhanTeng Lin, Wenmian Yang, Kun Zhou et al.ACL 2026
- Grammar Pruning: Enabling Low-Latency Zero-Shot Task-Oriented Language Models for Edge AIOctavian Alexandru Trifan, Jason Lee Weber, Marc Titus Trifan, Alexandru Nicolau et al.EMNLP 2025
Builds on17
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Towards Revealing the Mystery behind Chain of Thought: A Theoretical PerspectiveGuhao Feng, Bohang Zhang, Yuntian Gu, Haotian Ye et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 470 citations
- Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language ModelsDenny Zhou, Nathanael Schärli, Le Hou, Jason Wei et al.ICLR 2023 · 318 citations
Related papers
- Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language ModelsLei Wang, Wanyu Xu, Yihuai Lan, Zhiqiang Hu et al.ACL 2023 · 249 citations
- Decomposed Prompting: A Modular Approach for Solving Complex TasksTushar Khot, Harsh Trivedi, Matthew Finlayson, Yao Fu et al.ICLR 2023 · 94 citations
- ECLM: Entity Level Language Model for Spoken Language Understanding with Chain of IntentShangjian Yin, Peijie Huang, Jiatian Chen, Haojing Huang et al.ACL 2025 · 12 citations
- QG-CoC: Question-Guided Chain-of-Captions for Large Multimodal ModelsKuei-Chun Kao, Hsu Tzu-Yin, Yunqi Hong, Ruochen Wang et al.EMNLP 2025
- Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task GeneralizationVictor Sanh, Albert Webson, Colin Raffel, Stephen H. Bach et al.ICLR 2022 · 1,976 citations
