Optimal Parallelization of Boosting
Arthur da Cunha, Mikael Møller Høgsgaard, Kasper Green Larsen
Abstract
Recent works on the parallel complexity of Boosting have established strong lower bounds on the tradeoff between the number of training rounds and the total parallel work per round . These works have also presented highly non-trivial parallel algorithms that shed light on different regions of this tradeoff. Despite these advancements, a significant gap persists between the theoretical lower bounds and the performance of these algorithms across much of the tradeoff space. In this work, we essentially close this gap by providing both improved lower bounds on the parallel complexity of weak-to-strong learners, and a parallel Boosting algorithm whose performance matches these bounds across the entire vs. compromise spectrum, up to logarithmic factors. Ultimately, this work settles the true parallel complexity of Boosting algorithms that are nearly sample-optimal.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on2
Related papers
- Revisiting Agnostic BoostingArthur da Cunha, Mikael Møller Høgsgaard, Andrea Paudice, Yuxin SunNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- AdaBoost is not an Optimal Weak to Strong LearnerMikael Møller Høgsgaard, Kasper Green Larsen, Martin RitzertICML 2023 · 8 citations
- The Many Faces of Optimal Weak-to-Strong LearningMikael Møller Høgsgaard, Kasper Green Larsen, Markus Engelund MathiasenNeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations
- Multiclass Boosting and the Cost of Weak LearningNataly Brukhim, Elad Hazan, Shay Moran, Indraneel Mukherjee et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 16 citations
- Sample-Efficient Agnostic BoostingUdaya Ghai, Karan SinghNeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations
