EvoLM: In Search of Lost Training Dynamics for Language Model Reasoning
Zhenting Qi, Fan Nie, Alexandre Alahi, James Y. Zou, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Yilun Du, Eric P. Xing, Sham M. Kakade, Hanlin Zhang
Abstract
Modern language model (LM) training has been divided into multiple stages, making it difficult for downstream developers to evaluate the impact of design choices made at each stage. We present EvoLM , a model suite that enables systematic and transparent analysis of LMs’ training dynamics across pre-training, continued pre-training, supervised fine-tuning, and reinforcement learning. We train over 100 LMs with 1B and 4B parameters from scratch, and evaluate both upstream (language modeling) and downstream (problem-solving) capabilities, including considerations of both in-domain and out-of-domain generalization. Key insights highlight the diminishing returns from excessive pre-training and post-training, the importance and practices of mitigating forgetting during domain-specific continued pre-training, the crucial role of continued pre-training in bridging pre-training and post-training phases, and various intricate trade-offs when configuring supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning. To facilitate open research and reproducibility, we release all pre-trained and post-trained models, training datasets for all stages, and our entire training and evaluation pipeline.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6625bce4-2290-4be0-9a99-084b45144a9dCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on29
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural LanguageYonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Ronan Le Bras, Jianfeng Gao et al.AAAI 2020 · 2,916 citations
- Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and ScalingStella Biderman, Hailey Schoelkopf, Quentin Gregory Anthony, Herbie Bradley et al.ICML 2023 · 1,822 citations
- Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?Zhiqi Chen, Rui Lu, Andrew Zhao, Zhaokai Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1,109 citations
Related papers
- Overtrained Language Models Are Harder to Fine-TuneJacob Mitchell Springer, Sachin Goyal, Kaiyue Wen, Tanishq Kumar et al.ICML 2025
- Why Does Reinforcement Learning Generalize? A Feature-Level Mechanistic Study of Post-Training in Large Language ModelsDan Shi, Zhuowen Han, Simon Ostermann, Renren Jin et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- Why Supervised Fine-Tuning Fails to Learn: A Systematic Study of Incomplete Learning in Large Language ModelsChao Xue, Yao Wang, Mengqiao Liu, Di Liang et al.ACL 2026 · 5 citations
- How to Train Long-Context Language Models (Effectively)Tianyu Gao, Alexander Wettig, Howard Yen, Danqi ChenACL 2025
- Evo-1: Lightweight Vision-Language-Action Model with Preserved Semantic AlignmentTao Lin, Yilei Zhong, Yuxin Du, Jingjing Zhang et al.CVPR 2026 · 47 citations
