Architecture Matters: Uncovering Implicit Mechanisms in Graph Contrastive Learning
Xiaojun Guo, Yifei Wang, Zeming Wei, Yisen Wang
Abstract
With the prosperity of contrastive learning for visual representation learning (VCL), it is also adapted to the graph domain and yields promising performance. However, through a systematic study of various graph contrastive learning (GCL) methods, we observe that some common phenomena among existing GCL methods that are quite different from the original VCL methods, including 1) positive samples are not a must for GCL; 2) negative samples are not necessary for graph classification, neither for node classification when adopting specific normalization modules; 3) data augmentations have much less influence on GCL, as simple domain-agnostic augmentations (e.g., Gaussian noise) can also attain fairly good performance. By uncovering how the implicit inductive bias of GNNs works in contrastive learning, we theoretically provide insights into the above intriguing properties of GCL. Rather than directly porting existing VCL methods to GCL, we advocate for more attention toward the unique architecture of graph learning and consider its implicit influence when designing GCL methods. Code is available at https: //github.com/PKU-ML/ArchitectureMattersGCL .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers7
- Efficient Contrastive Learning for Fast and Accurate Inference on GraphsTeng Xiao, Huaisheng Zhu, Zhiwei Zhang, Zhimeng Guo et al.ICML 2024 · 15 citations
- LOHA: Direct Graph Spectral Contrastive Learning Between Low-Pass and High-Pass ViewsZiyun Zou, Yinghui Jiang, Lian Shen, Juan Liu et al.AAAI 2025 · 8 citations
- Perfect Alignment May be Poisonous to Graph Contrastive LearningJingyu Liu, Huayi Tang, Yong LiuICML 2024 · 4 citations
- GLNCD: Graph-Level Novel Category DiscoveryBowen Deng, Lele Fu, Sheng Huang, Tianchi Liao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- GNN-Transformer Cooperative Architecture for Trustworthy Graph Contrastive LearningJianqing Liang, Xinkai Wei, Min Chen, Zhiqiang Wang et al.AAAI 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on39
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- Bootstrap Your Own Latent - A New Approach to Self-Supervised LearningJean-Bastien Grill, Florian Strub, Florent Altché, Corentin Tallec et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 9,171 citations
- Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster AssignmentsMathilde Caron, Ishan Misra, Julien Mairal, Priya Goyal et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 5,249 citations
- Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on GraphsWeihua Hu, Matthias Fey, Marinka Zitnik, Yuxiao Dong et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,935 citations
Related papers
- Graph Contrastive Learning with AugmentationsYuning You, Tianlong Chen, Yongduo Sui, Ting Chen et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,042 citations
- Neighbor Contrastive Learning on Learnable Graph AugmentationXiao Shen, Dewang Sun, Shirui Pan, Xi Zhou et al.AAAI 2023 · 144 citations
- ProGCL: Rethinking Hard Negative Mining in Graph Contrastive LearningJun Xia, Lirong Wu, Ge Wang, Jintao Chen et al.ICML 2022 · 174 citations
- Adversarial Contrastive Graph Augmentation with Counterfactual RegularizationTao Long, Lei Zhang, Liang Zhang, Laizhong CuiAAAI 2025 · 5 citations
- MA-GCL: Model Augmentation Tricks for Graph Contrastive LearningXumeng Gong, Cheng Yang, Chuan ShiAAAI 2023 · 68 citations
