Computably Continuous Reinforcement-Learning Objectives Are PAC-Learnable
Cambridge Yang, Michael Littman, Michael Carbin
Abstract
In reinforcement learning, the classic objectives of maximizing discounted and finite-horizon cumulative rewards are PAC-learnable: There are algorithms that learn a near-optimal policy with high probability using a finite amount of samples and computation. In recent years, researchers have introduced objectives and corresponding reinforcement-learning algorithms beyond the classic cumulative rewards, such as objectives specified as linear temporal logic formulas. However, questions about the PAC-learnability of these new objectives have remained open. This work demonstrates the PAC-learnability of general reinforcement-learning objectives through sufficient conditions for PAC-learnability in two analysis settings. In particular, for the analysis that considers only sample complexity, we prove that if an objective given as an oracle is uniformly continuous, then it is PAC-learnable. Further, for the analysis that considers computational complexity, we prove that if an objective is computable, then it is PAC-learnable. In other words, if a procedure computes successive approximations of the objective's value, then the objective is PAC-learnable. We give three applications of our condition on objectives from the literature with previously unknown PAC-learnability and prove that these objectives are PAC-learnable. Overall, our result helps verify existing objectives' PAC-learnability. Also, as some studied objectives that are not uniformly continuous have been shown to be not PAC-learnable, our results could guide the design of new PAC-learnable objectives.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 65968919-5fec-4b0b-8c9b-b5beaf257c4bBuilds on2
Related papers
- Reinforcement Learning with LTL and ω-Regular Objectives via Optimality-Preserving Translation to Average RewardsXuan-Bach Le, Dominik Wagner, Leon Witzman, Alexander Rabinovich et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 17 citations
- On the Expressivity of Objective-Specification Formalisms in Reinforcement LearningRohan Subramani, Marcus Williams, Max Heitmann, Halfdan Holm et al.ICLR 2024 · 3 citations
- Reinforcement Learning from Reachability Specifications: PAC Guarantees with Expected Conditional DistanceJakub Svoboda, Suguman Bansal, Krishnendu ChatterjeeICML 2024 · 2 citations
- Uniform Last-Iterate Guarantee for Bandits and Reinforcement LearningJunyan Liu, Yunfan Li, Ruosong Wang, Lin YangNeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations
- Instructing Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning Agents with Temporal Logic ObjectivesWenjie Qiu, Wensen Mao, He ZhuNeurIPS 2023 · 44 citations
