Learning Markov Games with Adversarial Opponents: Efficient Algorithms and Fundamental Limits
Qinghua Liu, Yuanhao Wang, Chi Jin
Abstract
An ideal strategy in zero-sum games should not only grant the player an average reward no less than the value of Nash equilibrium, but also exploit the (adaptive) opponents when they are suboptimal. While most existing works in Markov games focus exclusively on the former objective, it remains open whether we can achieve both objectives simultaneously. To address this problem, this work studies no-regret learning in Markov games with adversarial opponents when competing against the best fixed policy in hindsight. Along this direction, we present a new complete set of positive and negative results: When the policies of the opponents are revealed at the end of each episode, we propose new efficient algorithms achieving -regret bounds when either (1) the baseline policy class is small or (2) the opponent's policy class is small. This is complemented with an exponential lower bound when neither conditions are true. When the policies of the opponents are not revealed, we prove a statistical hardness result even in the most favorable scenario when both above conditions are true. Our hardness result is much stronger than the existing hardness results which either only involve computational hardness, or require further restrictions on the algorithms.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 658ff15b-0cc8-4bcf-9b62-a96877bd1ac4Cited by top-tier papers10
- Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning of Partially Observable Markov GamesQinghua Liu, Csaba Szepesvári, Chi JinNeurIPS 2022 · 43 citations
- On the Complexity of Adversarial Decision MakingDylan J. Foster, Alexander Rakhlin, Ayush Sekhari, Karthik SridharanNeurIPS 2022 · 37 citations
- Regret Minimization and Convergence to Equilibria in General-sum Markov GamesLiad Erez, Tal Lancewicki, Uri Sherman, Tomer Koren et al.ICML 2023 · 35 citations
- Policy Optimization for Markov Games: Unified Framework and Faster ConvergenceRunyu Zhang, Qinghua Liu, Huan Wang, Caiming Xiong et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 32 citations
- Hardness of Independent Learning and Sparse Equilibrium Computation in Markov GamesDylan J. Foster, Noah Golowich, Sham M. KakadeICML 2023 · 14 citations
Builds on11
- Emergent Tool Use From Multi-Agent AutocurriculaBowen Baker, Ingmar Kanitscheider, Todor M. Markov, Yi Wu et al.ICLR 2020 · 751 citations
- Provable Self-Play Algorithms for Competitive Reinforcement LearningYu Bai, Chi JinICML 2020 · 169 citations
- Near-Optimal Reinforcement Learning with Self-PlayYu Bai, Chi Jin, Tiancheng YuNeurIPS 2020 · 150 citations
- A Sharp Analysis of Model-based Reinforcement Learning with Self-PlayQinghua Liu, Tiancheng Yu, Yu Bai, Chi JinICML 2021 · 137 citations
- Learning Adversarial Markov Decision Processes with Bandit Feedback and Unknown TransitionChi Jin, Tiancheng Jin, Haipeng Luo, Suvrit Sra et al.ICML 2020 · 117 citations
Related papers
- Learning in Markov Games with Adaptive Adversaries: Policy Regret, Fundamental Barriers, and Efficient AlgorithmsThanh Nguyen-Tang, Raman AroraNeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations
- Online Learning in Unknown Markov GamesYi Tian, Yuanhao Wang, Tiancheng Yu, Suvrit SraICML 2021 · 48 citations
- Best of Both Worlds: Regret Minimization versus Minimax PlayAdrian Müller, Jon Schneider, Stratis Skoulakis, Luca Viano et al.ICML 2025
- Provably Efficient Fictitious Play Policy Optimization for Zero-Sum Markov Games with Structured TransitionsShuang Qiu, Xiaohan Wei, Jieping Ye, Zhaoran Wang et al.ICML 2021 · 12 citations
- Is Learning in Games Good for the Learners?William Brown, Jon Schneider, Kiran VodrahalliNeurIPS 2023 · 27 citations
