Lune

EMNLP Findings2022

Low-resource Interactive Active Labeling for Fine-tuning Language Models

Seiji Maekawa, Dan Zhang, Hannah Kim, Sajjadur Rahman, Estevam Hruschka

Abstract

Recently, active learning (AL) methods have been used to effectively fine-tune pre-trained language models for various NLP tasks such as sentiment analysis and document classification. However, given the task of fine-tuning language models, understanding the impact of different aspects on AL methods such as labeling cost, sample acquisition latency, and the diversity of the datasets necessitates a deeper investigation. This paper examines the performance of existing AL methods within a lowresource, interactive labeling setting. We observe that existing methods often underperform in such a setting while exhibiting higher latency and a lack of generalizability. To overcome these challenges, we propose a novel active learning method TYROGUE that employs a hybrid sampling strategy to minimize labeling cost and acquisition latency while providing a framework for adapting to dataset diversity via user guidance. Through our experiments, we observe that compared to SOTA methods, TY-ROGUE reduces the labeling cost by up to 43% and the acquisition latency by as much as 11X, while achieving comparable accuracy. Finally, we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of TYROGUE by exploring the impact of dataset characteristics.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · 1 top-tier paper that cites it · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers1

  1. Interactive Multi-fidelity Learning for Cost-effective Adaptation of Language Model with Sparse Human SupervisionJiaxin Zhang, Zhuohang Li, Kamalika Das, Kumar SricharanNeurIPS 2023 · 6 citations

Builds on5

  1. Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningHaokun Liu, Derek Tam, Mohammed Muqeeth, Jay Mohta et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 1,483 citations
  2. Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower BoundsJordan T. Ash, Chicheng Zhang, Akshay Krishnamurthy, John Langford et al.ICLR 2020 · 974 citations
  3. Batch Active Learning at ScaleGui Citovsky, Giulia DeSalvo, Claudio Gentile, Lazaros Karydas et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 220 citations
  4. Cold-start Active Learning through Self-supervised Language ModelingMichelle Yuan, Hsuan-Tien Lin, Jordan L. Boyd-GraberEMNLP 2020 · 128 citations
  5. Revisiting Uncertainty-based Query Strategies for Active Learning with TransformersChristopher Schröder, Andreas Niekler, Martin PotthastACL Findings 2022 · 57 citations

Related papers

  1. D-CALM: A Dynamic Clustering-based Active Learning Approach for Mitigating BiasSabit Hassan, Malihe AlikhaniACL Findings 2023 · 4 citations
  2. On Dataset Transferability in Active Learning for TransformersFran Jelenic, Josip Jukic, Nina Drobac, Jan SnajderACL Findings 2023 · 4 citations
  3. Prototypical Fine-Tuning: Towards Robust Performance under Varying Data SizesYiqiao Jin, Xiting Wang, Yaru Hao, Yizhou Sun et al.AAAI 2023 · 15 citations
  4. Active Learning for BERT: An Empirical StudyLiat Ein-Dor, Alon Halfon, Ariel Gera, Eyal Shnarch et al.EMNLP 2020 · 144 citations
  5. Parameter-Efficient Language Model Tuning with Active Learning in Low-Resource SettingsJosip Jukic, Jan SnajderEMNLP 2023 · 4 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines