ModuleGuard: Understanding and Detecting Module Conflicts in Python Ecosystem
Ruofan Zhu, Xingyu Wang, Chengwei Liu, Zhengzi Xu, Wenbo Shen, Rui Chang, Yang Liu
Abstract
Python has become one of the most popular programming languages for software development due to its simplicity, readability, and versatility. As the Python ecosystem grows, developers face increasing challenges in avoiding module conflicts, which occur when different packages have the same namespace modules. Unfortunately, existing work has neither investigated the module conflict comprehensively nor provided tools to detect the conflict. Therefore, this paper systematically investigates the module conflict problem and its impact on the Python ecosystem. We propose a novel technique called InstSimulator, which leverages semantics and installation simulation to achieve accurate and efficient module extraction. Based on this, we implement a tool called ModuleGuard to detect module conflicts for the Python ecosystem. For the study, we first collect 97 MC issues, classify the characteristics and causes of these MC issues, summarize three different conflict patterns, and analyze their potential threats. Then, we conducted a large-scale analysis of the whole PyPI ecosystem (4.2 million packages) and GitHub popular projects (3,711 projects) to detect each MC pattern and analyze their potential impact. We discovered that module conflicts still impact numerous TPLs and GitHub projects. This is primarily due to developers' lack of understanding of the modules within their direct dependencies, not to mention the modules of the transitive dependencies. Our work reveals Python's shortcomings in handling naming conflicts and provides a tool and guidelines for developers to detect conflicts.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 64809667-43f1-4db4-9896-117be3c2df96Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on8
- Watchman: monitoring dependency conflicts for Python library ecosystemYing Wang, Ming Wen, Yepang Liu, Yibo Wang et al.ICSE 2020 · 65 citations
- Fixing dependency errors for Python build reproducibilitySuchita Mukherjee, Abigail Almanza, Cindy Rubio-GonzálezISSTA 2021 · 55 citations
- Restoring Execution Environments of Jupyter NotebooksJiawei Wang, Li Li, Andreas ZellerICSE 2021 · 49 citations
- An Empirical Study of Malicious Code In PyPI EcosystemWenbo Guo, Zhengzi Xu, Chengwei Liu, Cheng Huang et al.ASE 2023 · 31 citations
- Knowledge-Based Environment Dependency Inference for Python ProgramsHongjie Ye, Wei Chen, Wensheng Dou, Guoquan Wu et al.ICSE 2022 · 21 citations
Related papers
- Less is More? An Empirical Study on Configuration Issues in Python PyPI EcosystemYun Peng, Ruida Hu, Ruoke Wang, Cuiyun Gao et al.ICSE 2024 · 5 citations
- smartPip: A Smart Approach to Resolving Python Dependency Conflict IssuesChao Wang, Rongxin Wu, Haohao Song, Jiwu Shu et al.ASE 2022 · 15 citations
- Cutting the Gordian Knot: Detecting Malicious PyPI Packages via a Knowledge-Mining FrameworkWenbo Guo, Chengwei Liu, Ming Kang, Yiran Zhang et al.USENIX Security 2026 · 1 citation
- Uncovering Similar but Different Packages in PyPI and Potential Security ThreatsSunha Park, Soojin Han, Seunghoon WooFSE 2026
- ConfuGuard: Using Metadata to Detect Active and Stealthy Package Confusion Attacks Accurately and at ScaleWenxin Jiang, Berk Çakar, Mikola Lysenko, James C DavisICSE 2026 · 2 citations
