Temporal-Aware Evaluation and Learning for Temporal Graph Neural Networks
Junwei Su, Shan Wu
Abstract
Temporal Graph Neural Networks (TGNNs) are a family of graph neural networks designed to model and learn dynamic information from temporal graphs. Given their substantial empirical success, there is an escalating interest in TGNNs within the research community. However, the majority of these efforts have been channelled towards algorithm and system design, with the evaluation metrics receiving comparatively less attention. Effective evaluation metrics are crucial for providing detailed performance insights, particularly in the temporal domain. This paper investigates the commonly used evaluation metrics for TGNNs and illustrates the failure mechanisms of these metrics in capturing essential temporal structures in the predictive behaviour of TGNNs. We provide a mathematical formulation of existing performance metrics and utilize an instance-based study to underscore their inadequacies in identifying volatility clustering (the occurrence of emerging errors within a brief interval). This phenomenon has profound implications for both algorithm and system design in the temporal domain. To address this deficiency, we introduce a new volatility-aware evaluation metric (termed volatility cluster statistics), designed for a more refined analysis of model temporal performance. Additionally, we demonstrate how this metric can serve as a temporal-volatility-aware training objective to alleviate the clustering of temporal errors. Through comprehensive experiments on various TGNN models, we validate our analysis and the proposed approach. The empirical results offer revealing insights: 1) existing TGNNs are prone to making errors with volatility clustering, and 2) TGNNs with different mechanisms to capture temporal information exhibit distinct volatility clustering patterns. Moreover, our empirical findings demonstrate that our proposed training objective effectively reduces volatility clusters in error.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on12
- Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on GraphsWeihua Hu, Matthias Fey, Marinka Zitnik, Yuxiao Dong et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,935 citations
- EvolveGCN: Evolving Graph Convolutional Networks for Dynamic GraphsAldo Pareja, Giacomo Domeniconi, Jie Chen, Tengfei Ma et al.AAAI 2020 · 1,429 citations
- Inductive representation learning on temporal graphsDa Xu, Chuanwei Ruan, Evren Körpeoglu, Sushant Kumar et al.ICLR 2020 · 901 citations
- A Fair Comparison of Graph Neural Networks for Graph ClassificationFederico Errica, Marco Podda, Davide Bacciu, Alessio MicheliICLR 2020 · 508 citations
- Towards Better Dynamic Graph Learning: New Architecture and Unified LibraryLe Yu, Leilei Sun, Bowen Du, Weifeng LvNeurIPS 2023 · 323 citations
Related papers
- Towards Ideal Temporal Graph Neural Networks: Evaluations and Conclusions after 10,000 GPU HoursYuxin Yang, Hongkuan Zhou, Rajgopal Kannan, Viktor K. PrasannaVLDB 2025 · 1 citation
- On the Scalability of Temporal Relative Positional Encoding for Dynamic Link PredictionKe Cheng, Linzhi Peng, Pengyang Wang, Heng Chang et al.KDD 2025 · 2 citations
- Training-free Counterfactual Explanation for Temporal Graph Model InferenceMingjian Lu, Haolai Che, Yangxin Fan, Qu Liu et al.ICLR 2026
- TimeSGN: Scalable and Effective Temporal Graph Neural NetworkYuanyuan Xu, Wenjie Zhang, Ying Zhang, Maria E. Orlowska et al.ICDE 2024 · 15 citations
- Benchtemp: A General Benchmark for Evaluating Temporal Graph Neural NetworksQiang Huang, Xin Wang, Susie Xi Rao, Zhichao Han et al.ICDE 2024 · 7 citations
