Diversified Adversarial Attacks based on Conjugate Gradient Method
Keiichiro Yamamura, Haruki Sato, Nariaki Tateiwa, Nozomi Hata, Toru Mitsutake, Issa Oe, Hiroki Ishikura, Katsuki Fujisawa
Abstract
Deep learning models are vulnerable to adversarial examples, and adversarial attacks used to generate such examples have attracted considerable research interest. Although existing methods based on the steepest descent have achieved high attack success rates, ill-conditioned problems occasionally reduce their performance. To address this limitation, we utilize the conjugate gradient (CG) method, which is effective for this type of problem, and propose a novel attack algorithm inspired by the CG method, named the Auto Conjugate Gradient (ACG) attack. The results of large-scale evaluation experiments conducted on the latest robust models show that, for most models, ACG was able to find more adversarial examples with fewer iterations than the existing SOTA algorithm Auto-PGD (APGD). We investigated the difference in search performance between ACG and APGD in terms of diversification and intensification, and define a measure called Diversity Index (DI) to quantify the degree of diversity. From the analysis of the diversity using this index, we show that the more diverse search of the proposed method remarkably improves its attack success rate.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 643cf536-b3be-4277-b7e1-63768d0c8d41Cited by top-tier papers4
- MOS-Attack: A Scalable Multi-objective Adversarial Attack FrameworkPing Guo, Cheng Gong, Xi Lin, Fei Liu et al.CVPR 2025
- Towards Million-Scale Adversarial Robustness Evaluation With Stronger Individual AttacksYong Xie, Weijie Zheng, Hanxun Huang, Guangnan Ye et al.CVPR 2025
- Perturbation Effects on Robustness and Individual FairnessXuran Li, Hao Xue, Peng Wu, Xingjun Ma et al.KDD 2026
- Time Shuffle: A Transferability-Booster for Multiple Audio Adversarial TasksJiacheng Deng, Dengpan Ye, Yuhong Liu, Zhaolin Wei et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on18
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingEric Wong, Leslie Rice, J. Zico KolterICLR 2020 · 1,352 citations
- Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningLeslie Rice, Eric Wong, J. Zico KolterICML 2020 · 935 citations
- Improving Adversarial Robustness Requires Revisiting Misclassified ExamplesYisen Wang, Difan Zou, Jinfeng Yi, James Bailey et al.ICLR 2020 · 829 citations
Related papers
- Constrained Gradient Descent: A Powerful and Principled Evasion Attack Against Neural NetworksWeiran Lin, Keane Lucas, Lujo Bauer, Michael K. Reiter et al.ICML 2022 · 5 citations
- Composite Adversarial AttacksXiaofeng Mao, Yuefeng Chen, Shuhui Wang, Hang Su et al.AAAI 2021 · 60 citations
- AutoDA: Automated Decision-based Iterative Adversarial AttacksQi-An Fu, Yinpeng Dong, Hang Su, Jun Zhu et al.USENIX Security 2022
- Nesterov Accelerated Gradient and Scale Invariance for Adversarial AttacksJiadong Lin, Chuanbiao Song, Kun He, Liwei Wang et al.ICLR 2020 · 765 citations
- Improving Adversarial Robustness by Putting More Regularizations on Less Robust SamplesDongyoon Yang, Insung Kong, Yongdai KimICML 2023 · 15 citations
