On the Benefits of Sensorimotor Regularities as Design Constraints for Superpower Interactions in Mixed Reality
Jingyi Li, Per Ola Kristensson
Abstract
Mixed Reality (MR) systems enable users to perform augmented superpowers that transcend real-world limitations. However, it remains unclear what types of action-outcome mappings can enable users to easily learn, control, and feel a sense of ownership of these augmented superpowers. Humans develop a set of sensorimotor regularities (i.e., image schemas and lawful relations between them) from recurring bodily experiences since early infancy, and use them to predict the outcome of our actions, or choose actions based on the desired outcome. We investigate whether sensorimotor regularities (SRs) can serve as effective design constraints for superpower interactions, by comparing three temporal manipulation methods in MR games: (1) mid-air button control; (2) gestures incongruent with SRs embedded in the concept of temporal manipulation; and (3) gestures congruent with these SRs. A within-subject study with 18 participants reveals that the SRs-congruent method enables significantly improved task performance, lower overall workload, and a greater sense of agency and presence compared to both an SRs-incongruent method and a mid-air button-based method. The SRs-congruent method also enabled faster mastery of the augmented superpower. No significant difference was observed in any of the above-mentioned metrics between the SRs-incongruent and mid-air button-based methods. These results empirically demonstrate multiple benefits of SRs as design constraints for superpower controls in MR, and encourage future research to explore their wider applicability in superpower interaction design.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 642aa606-4b53-4ce0-b8f2-3dfcd44e3ef8Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on7
- Perception! Immersion! Empowerment! Superpowers as Inspiration for VisualizationWesley Willett, Bon Adriel Aseniero, Sheelagh Carpendale, Pierre Dragicevic et al.IEEE VIS 2021 · 90 citations
- Towards Understanding Diminished RealityYifei Cheng, Hang Yin, Yukang Yan, Jan Gugenheimer et al.CHI 2022 · 76 citations
- Beyond Being Real: A Sensorimotor Control Perspective on Interactions in Virtual RealityParastoo Abtahi, Sidney Q. Hough, James A. Landay, Sean FollmerCHI 2022 · 60 citations
- Who Put That There? Temporal Navigation of Spatial Recordings by Direct ManipulationKlemen Lilija, Henning Pohl, Kasper HornbækCHI 2020 · 45 citations
- Volumetric Hybrid Workspaces: Interactions with Objects in Remote and Co-located TelepresenceAndrew Irlitti, Mesut Latifoglu, Thuong N. Hoang, Brandon Victor Syiem et al.CHI 2024 · 24 citations
Related papers
- From Movement Adaptation to De Novo Learning: A Design Space of VR Interaction TechniquesCleo Xiao, Difeng Yu, Erik Skjoldan Mortensen, Mark Schram Christensen et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- When Hands Meet Physics in Virtual Reality: Effects of Interaction Fidelity on User ExperienceChristos Lougiakis, Akrivi Katifori, Doug A. Bowman, Maria RoussouCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Investigating the Effect of Sensory Concurrency on Learning Haptic Spatiotemporal SignalsIain Carson, Aaron Quigley, Loraine Clarke, Uta HinrichsUbiComp 2021 · 5 citations
- Virtual Unreality: Augmentation-Oriented Ideation Through Design CardsRobin Neuhaus, Ronda Ringfort-Felner, Daniel Courtney, Madlen Kneile et al.CHI 2024 · 8 citations
- Augmenting Physical Buttons with Vibrotactile Feedback for Programmable FeelsChaeyong Park, Jinhyuk Yoon, Seungjae Oh, Seungmoon ChoiUIST 2020 · 44 citations
