(De)composing Craft: An Elementary Grammar for Sharing Expertise in Craft Workflows
Ritik Batra, Lydia Kim, Ilan Mandel, Amritansh Kwatra, Jane L. E, Steven J. Jackson, Thijs Roumen
Abstract
THIJS ROUMEN, Cornell Tech, USA Craft practices rely on evolving archives of skill and knowledge developed through generations of craftspeople experimenting with designs, materials, and techniques. Better documentation of these practices enables the sharing of knowledge and expertise between sites and generations. However, most documentation focuses on the linear steps leading to final artifacts, neglecting the distinct tacit knowledge, improvisational actions, and situated adaptations needed to meet the unique demands of each craft project. This omission limits knowledge sharing and reduces craft to a mechanical endeavor, rather than a sophisticated and contextual way of seeing, thinking, and doing. Drawing on expert interviews and literature from HCI, CSCW and the social sciences, we develop an elementary grammar to document improvisational actions of real-world craft practices. We demonstrate the utility of this grammar with a MLLM-powered interface called CraftLink that can be used to analyze expert videos and generate documentation to share material and contextual variations of practices with other knowledgeable but non-master craftspeople. Our user study with expert crocheters (N=7) evaluates our grammar's effectiveness in capturing and sharing expert knowledge with other craftspeople, offering new pathways for computational systems to support collaborative archives of knowledge and practice across time, space, and skill levels. We conclude by showing how our grammar address four key tensions of the craft learning environment: personal and shareable documentation, fragmented and discoverable expertise, linear and iterative practices, and data privacy and ownership.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → HCI theory, concepts and models; Interactive systems and tools.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on16
- Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Tao Xu, Greg Brockman et al.ICML 2023 · 6,966 citations
- ARTEMIS: A Collaborative Mixed-Reality System for Immersive Surgical TelementoringDanilo Gasques, Janet G. Johnson, Tommy Sharkey, Yuanyuan Feng et al.CHI 2021 · 144 citations
- CoilCAM: Enabling Parametric Design for Clay 3D Printing Through an Action-Oriented Toolpath Programming SystemSamuelle Bourgault, Pilar Wiley, Avi Farber, Jennifer JacobsCHI 2023 · 75 citations
- What We Can Learn From Visual Artists About Software DevelopmentJingyi Li, Sonia Hashim, Jennifer JacobsCHI 2021 · 62 citations
- Learning from Hybrid Craft: Investigating and Reflecting on Innovating and Enlivening Traditional Craft through Literature ReviewGuanhong Liu, Qingyuan Shi, Yuan Yao, Yuan-Ling Feng et al.CHI 2024 · 38 citations
Related papers
- StitchFlow: Enabling In-Situ Creative Explorations of Crochet Patterns With Stitch Tracking and Process SharingZofia Marciniak, Punn Lertjaturaphat, Andrea BianchiUIST 2025 · 1 citation
- Craftspeople as Technical Collaborators: Lessons Learned through an Experimental Weaving ResidencyLaura Devendorf, Katya Arquilla, Sandra Wirtanen, Allison P. Anderson et al.CHI 2020 · 86 citations
- Measurement Patterns: User-Oriented Strategies for Dealing with Measurements and Dimensions in Making ProcessesRaf Ramakers, Danny Leen, Jeeeun Kim, Kris Luyten et al.CHI 2023 · 11 citations
- Unsupervised Hierarchical Skill DiscoveryDamion Harvey, Geraud Nangue Tasse, Benjamin Rosman, Branden Ingram et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- (Re)collecting Craft: Reviving Materials, Techniques, and Pedagogies of Craft for Computational MakersAmy Cheatle, Steven J. JacksonCSCW 2023 · 14 citations
