USENIX Security2020Top-tier venue
Updates-Leak: Data Set Inference and Reconstruction Attacks in Online Learning
Ahmed Salem, Apratim Bhattacharya, Michael Backes, Mario Fritz, Yang Zhang
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) has progressed rapidly during the past decade and the major factor that drives such development is the unprecedented large-scale data. As data generation is a continuous process, this leads to ML model owners updating their models frequently with newly-collected data in an online learning scenario. In consequence, if an ML model is queried with the same set of data samples at two different points in time, it will provide different results. In this paper, we investigate whether the change in the output of a black-box ML model before and after being updated can leak information of the dataset used to perform the update, namely the updating set. This constitutes a new attack surface against black-box ML models and such information leakage may compromise the intellectual property and data privacy of the ML model owner. We propose four attacks following an encoder-decoder formulation, which allows inferring diverse information of the updating set. Our new attacks are facilitated by state-of-the-art deep learning techniques. In particular, we propose a hybrid generative model (CBM-GAN) that is based on generative adversarial networks (GANs) but includes a reconstructive loss that allows reconstructing accurate samples. Our experiments show that the proposed attacks achieve strong performance.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 632a6c2a-804f-4ad1-9dcd-d4b000a2e540Cited by top-tier papers64
- Membership Inference Attacks From First PrinciplesNicholas Carlini, Steve Chien, Milad Nasr, Shuang Song et al.S&P 2022 · 1,049 citations
- Systematic Evaluation of Privacy Risks of Machine Learning ModelsLiwei Song, Prateek MittalUSENIX Security 2021 · 483 citations
- MemGuard: Defending against Black-Box Membership Inference Attacks via Adversarial ExamplesJinyuan Jia, Ahmed Salem, Michael Backes, Yang Zhang et al.CCS 2019 · 464 citations
- Privacy Risks of General-Purpose Language ModelsXudong Pan, Mi Zhang, Shouling Ji, Min YangS&P 2020 · 291 citations
- Stealing Links from Graph Neural NetworksXinlei He, Jinyuan Jia, Michael Backes, Neil Zhenqiang Gong et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 226 citations
Builds on22
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIsFlorian Tramèr, Fan Zhang, Ari Juels, Michael K. Reiter et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 2,088 citations
- Comprehensive Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning: Passive and Active White-box Inference Attacks against Centralized and Federated LearningMilad Nasr, Reza Shokri, Amir HoumansadrS&P 2019 · 1,778 citations
Related papers
- Reinforcement Learning-Based Black-Box Model Inversion AttacksGyojin Han, Jaehyun Choi, Haeil Lee, Junmo KimCVPR 2023
- Black-Box Privacy Attacks on Shared Representations in Multitask LearningJohn Abascal, Nicolás Berrios, Alina Oprea, Jonathan Ullman et al.ICLR 2026
- Property Inference Attacks Against GANsJunhao Zhou, Yufei Chen, Chao Shen, Yang ZhangNDSS 2022
- Machine Learning Models that Remember Too MuchCongzheng Song, Thomas Ristenpart, Vitaly ShmatikovCCS 2017 · 582 citations
- BridgePure: Limited Protection Leakage Can Break Black-Box Data ProtectionYihan Wang, Yiwei Lu, Xiao-Shan Gao, Gautam Kamath et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
