EXP-Bench: Can AI Conduct AI Research Experiments?
Patrick Tser Jern Kon, Qiuyi Ding, Jiachen Liu, Xinyi Zhu, Jingjia Peng, Jiarong Xing, Yibo Huang, Yiming Qiu, Jayanth Srinivasa, Myungjin Lee, Mosharaf Chowdhury, Matei Zaharia, Ang Chen
Abstract
Automating AI research holds immense potential for accelerating scientific progress, yet current AI agents struggle with the complexities of rigorous, endto-end experimentation. We introduce EXP-Bench, a novel benchmark designed to systematically evaluate AI agents on complete research experiments sourced from influential AI publications. Given a research question and incomplete starter code, EXP-Bench challenges AI agents to formulate hypotheses, design and implement experimental procedures, execute them, and analyze results. To enable the creation of such intricate and authentic tasks with high-fidelity, we design a semi-autonomous pipeline to extract and structure crucial experimental details from these research papers and their associated open-source code. With the pipeline, EXP-Bench curated 461 AI research tasks from 51 top-tier AI research papers. Evaluations of leading AI agents, such as OpenHands [87] and IterativeAgent [76] on EXP-Bench demonstrate partial capabilities: while scores on individual experimental aspects such as design or implementation correctness reach 20-35%, the success rate for complete, executable experiments was a mere 0.5%. By identifying these bottlenecks and providing realistic step-by-step experiment procedures, EXP-Bench serves as a vital tool for future AI agents to improve their ability to conduct AI research experiments. EXP-Bench is open-sourced at https://github.com/ Just-Curieous/Curie/tree/main/benchmark/exp_bench .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 62c426b3-b125-45d3-a084-7c423390f670Cited by top-tier papers2
- AstaBench: Rigorous Benchmarking of AI Agents with a Scientific Research SuiteJonathan Bragg, Mike D'Arcy, Nishant Balepur, Dan Bareket et al.ICLR 2026 · 51 citations
- FIRE-Bench: Evaluating AI Agents on the Rediscovery of Scientific InsightsZhen Wang, Fan Bai, Zhongyan Luo, Jinyan Su et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on53
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- AnimateDiff: Animate Your Personalized Text-to-Image Diffusion Models without Specific TuningYuwei Guo, Ceyuan Yang, Anyi Rao, Zhengyang Liang et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,493 citations
- Large Language Models as OptimizersChengrun Yang, Xuezhi Wang, Yifeng Lu, Hanxiao Liu et al.ICLR 2024 · 817 citations
- QuaRot: Outlier-Free 4-Bit Inference in Rotated LLMsSaleh Ashkboos, Amirkeivan Mohtashami, Maximilian L. Croci, Bo Li et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 723 citations
Related papers
- From Reproduction to Replication: Evaluating Research Agents with Progressive Code MaskingGyeongwon James Kim, Alex Wilf, Louis-Philippe Morency, Daniel FriedICLR 2026 · 12 citations
- RExBench: Can coding agents autonomously implement AI research extensions?Nicholas Edwards, Yukyung Lee, Yujun Audrey Mao, Yulu Qin et al.ACL 2026 · 10 citations
- AI-Researcher: Autonomous Scientific InnovationJiabin Tang, Lianghao Xia, Zhonghang Li, Chao HuangNeurIPS 2025 · 101 citations
- ScienceAgentBench: Toward Rigorous Assessment of Language Agents for Data-Driven Scientific DiscoveryZiru Chen, Shijie Chen, Yuting Ning, Qianheng Zhang et al.ICLR 2025 · 6 citations
- DeepResearch Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Deep Research AgentsMingxuan Du, Benfeng Xu, Chiwei Zhu, Licheng Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 250 citations
