Utility-Focused LLM Annotation for Retrieval and Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Hengran Zhang, Minghao Tang, Keping Bi, Jiafeng Guo, Shihao Liu, Daiting Shi, Dawei Yin, Xueqi Cheng
Abstract
This paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) for annotating document utility in training retrieval and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems, aiming to reduce dependence on costly human annotations. We address the gap between retrieval relevance and generative utility by employing LLMs to annotate document utility. To effectively utilize multiple positive samples per query, we introduce a novel loss that maximizes their summed marginal likelihood. Using the Qwen-2.5-32B model, we annotate utility on the MS MARCO dataset and conduct retrieval experiments on MS MARCO and BEIR, as well as RAG experiments on MS MARCO QA, NQ, and HotpotQA. Our results show that LLM-generated annotations enhance out-of-domain retrieval performance and improve RAG outcomes compared to models trained solely on human annotations or downstream QA metrics. Furthermore, combining LLM annotations with just 20% of human labels achieves performance comparable to using full human annotations. Our study offers a comprehensive approach to utilizing LLM annotations for initializing QA systems on new corpora. Our code and data are available at https://github .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 626892a5-1d82-43a3-a4d3-c552a3f99254Builds on14
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text RetrievalLee Xiong, Chenyan Xiong, Ye Li, Kwok-Fung Tang et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,547 citations
- Optimizing Dense Retrieval Model Training with Hard NegativesJingtao Zhan, Jiaxin Mao, Yiqun Liu, Jiafeng Guo et al.SIGIR 2021 · 242 citations
- Large Language Models can Accurately Predict Searcher PreferencesPaul Thomas, Seth Spielman, Nick Craswell, Bhaskar MitraSIGIR 2024 · 153 citations
- RocketQAv2: A Joint Training Method for Dense Passage Retrieval and Passage Re-rankingRuiyang Ren, Yingqi Qu, Jing Liu, Wayne Xin Zhao et al.EMNLP 2021 · 147 citations
Related papers
- Training Dense Retrievers with Multiple Positive PassagesBenben Wang, Minghao Tang, Hengran Zhang, Jiafeng Guo et al.KDD 2026 · 1 citation
- Are Large Language Models Good at Utility Judgments?Hengran Zhang, Ruqing Zhang, Jiafeng Guo, Maarten de Rijke et al.SIGIR 2024 · 20 citations
- ARL2: Aligning Retrievers with Black-box Large Language Models via Self-guided Adaptive Relevance LabelingLingxi Zhang, Yue Yu, Kuan Wang, Chao ZhangACL 2024
- Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Multi-Modal ContextsZhenghao Liu, Xingsheng Zhu, Tianshuo Zhou, Xinyi Zhang et al.ACM MM 2025 · 4 citations
- Unsupervised Information Refinement Training of Large Language Models for Retrieval-Augmented GenerationShicheng Xu, Liang Pang, Mo Yu, Fandong Meng et al.ACL 2024
