Lune

SODA2024Top-tier venue

How Many Neurons Does it Take to Approximate the Maximum?

Itay Safran, Daniel Reichman, Paul Valiant

2024Year
3Citations
4Top-tier citations

Abstract

We study the size of a neural network needed to approximate the maximum function over d inputs, in the most basic setting of approximating with respect to the L 2 norm, for continuous distributions, for a network that uses ReLU activations. We provide new lower and upper bounds on the width required for approximation across various depths. Our results establish new depth separations between depth 2 and 3, and depth 3 and 5 networks, as well as providing a depth O(log(log(d))) and width O(d) construction which approximates the maximum function. Our depth separation results are facilitated by a new lower bound for depth 2 networks approximating the maximum function over the uniform distribution, assuming an exponential upper bound on the size of the weights. Furthermore, we are able to use this depth 2 lower bound to provide tight bounds on the number of neurons needed to approximate the maximum by a depth 3 network. Our lower bounds are of potentially broad interest as they apply to the widely studied and used max function, in contrast to many previous results that base their bounds on specially constructed or pathological functions and distributions.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers4

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on2

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines