Improving Retrieval Augmented Language Model with Self-Reasoning

The Retrieval-Augmented Language Model (RALM) has demonstrated remarkable performance on knowledge-intensive tasks by integrating external knowledge during inference, which mitigates the factual hallucinations inherited in large language models (LLMs). Despite these advancements, challenges persist in the implementation of RALMs, particularly in terms of reliability and traceability. Specifically, the irrelevant document retrieval may result in unhelpful responses or even deteriorate the performance of LLMs, while the lack of appropriate citations in outputs complicates efforts to verify the trustworthiness of the models. To this end, we propose a novel self-reasoning framework aimed at improving the reliability and traceability of RALMs, whose core idea is to leverage reasoning trajectories generated by the LLM itself. The framework involves constructing self-reasoning trajectories through three processes: a relevance-aware process, an evidence-aware selective process, and a trajectory analysis process. We evaluated our framework across four public datasets (two short-form QA datasets, one long-form QA dataset, and one fact verification dataset) to demonstrate its superiority. Our method can outperform existing state-of-the-art models and achieve performance comparable with GPT-4, using only 2,000 training samples.