Rebalancing Return Coverage for Conditional Sequence Modeling in Offline Reinforcement Learning
Wensong Bai, Chufan Chen, Yichao Fu, Qihang Xu, Chao Zhang, Hui Qian
Abstract
Recent advancements in offline reinforcement learning (RL) have underscored the capabilities of conditional sequence modeling (CSM), a paradigm that models the action distribution conditioned on both historical trajectories and target returns associated with each state. However, due to the imbalanced return distribution caused by suboptimal datasets, CSM is grappling with a serious distributional shift problem when conditioning on high returns. While recent approaches attempt to empirically tackle this challenge through return rebalancing techniques such as weighted sampling and value-regularized supervision, the relationship between return rebalancing and the performance of CSM methods is not well understood. In this paper, we reveal that both expert-level and full-spectrum return-coverage critically influence the performance and sample efficiency of CSM policies. Building on this finding, we devise a simple yet effective return-coverage rebalancing mechanism that can be seamlessly integrated into common CSM frameworks, including the most widely used one, Decision Transformer (DT). The resulting CSM algorithm, referred to as Return-rebalanced Value-regularized Decision Transformer (RVDT), integrates both implicit and explicit return-coverage rebalancing mechanisms, and achieves state-of-the-art performance in the D4RL experiments.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 618c2ec9-52dd-42eb-945e-f47b3a0cc6fcBuilds on35
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence ModelingLili Chen, Kevin Lu, Aravind Rajeswaran, Kimin Lee et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 2,557 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 1,402 citations
- A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement LearningScott Fujimoto, Shixiang Shane GuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,292 citations
Related papers
- Q-value Regularized Transformer for Offline Reinforcement LearningShengchao Hu, Ziqing Fan, Chaoqin Huang, Li Shen et al.ICML 2024 · 34 citations
- Value-Guided Decision Transformer: A Unified Reinforcement Learning Framework for Online and Offline SettingsHongling Zheng, Li Shen, Yong Luo, Deheng Ye et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- Reinformer: Max-Return Sequence Modeling for Offline RLZifeng Zhuang, Dengyun Peng, Jinxin Liu, Ziqi Zhang et al.ICML 2024 · 29 citations
- Critic-Guided Decision Transformer for Offline Reinforcement LearningYuanfu Wang, Chao Yang, Ying Wen, Yu Liu et al.AAAI 2024 · 35 citations
- Q-learning Decision Transformer: Leveraging Dynamic Programming for Conditional Sequence Modelling in Offline RLTaku Yamagata, Ahmed Khalil, Raúl Santos-RodríguezICML 2023 · 121 citations
