Guaranteed Approximation Bounds for Mixed-Precision Neural Operators
Renbo Tu, Colin White, Jean Kossaifi, Boris Bonev, Gennady Pekhimenko, Kamyar Azizzadenesheli, Anima Anandkumar
Abstract
Neural operators, such as Fourier Neural Operators (FNO), form a principled approach for learning solution operators for partial differential equations (PDE) and other mappings between function spaces. However, many real-world problems require high-resolution training data, and the training time and limited GPU memory pose big barriers. One solution is to train neural operators in mixed precision to reduce the memory requirement and increase training speed. However, existing mixed-precision training techniques are designed for standard neural networks, and we find that their direct application to FNO leads to numerical overflow and poor memory efficiency. Further, at first glance, it may appear that mixed precision in FNO will lead to drastic accuracy degradation since reducing the precision of the Fourier transform yields poor results in classical numerical solvers. We show that this is not the case; in fact, we prove that reducing the precision in FNO still guarantees a good approximation bound, when done in a targeted manner. Specifically, we build on the intuition that neural operator learning inherently induces an approximation error, arising from discretizing the infinite-dimensional ground-truth input function, implying that training in full precision is not needed. We formalize this intuition by rigorously characterizing the approximation and precision errors of FNO and bounding these errors for general input functions. We prove that the precision error is asymptotically comparable to the approximation error. Based on this, we design a simple method to optimize the memory-intensive half-precision tensor contractions by greedily finding the optimal contraction order. Through extensive experiments on different state-of-the-art neural operators, datasets, and GPUs, we demonstrate that our approach reduces GPU memory usage by up to 50% and improves throughput by 58% with little or no reduction in accuracy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 616a6918-dc80-45ea-b62a-dbebc906e5a9Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on4
- Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential EquationsZongyi Li, Nikola Borislavov Kovachki, Kamyar Azizzadenesheli, Burigede Liu et al.ICLR 2021 · 3,911 citations
- Multipole Graph Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential EquationsZongyi Li, Nikola B. Kovachki, Kamyar Azizzadenesheli, Burigede Liu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 569 citations
- Multiwavelet-based Operator Learning for Differential EquationsGaurav Gupta, Xiongye Xiao, Paul BogdanNeurIPS 2021 · 355 citations
- Spherical Fourier Neural Operators: Learning Stable Dynamics on the SphereBoris Bonev, Thorsten Kurth, Christian Hundt, Jaideep Pathak et al.ICML 2023 · 280 citations
Related papers
- TurboFNO: High-Performance Fourier Neural Operator with Fused FFT-GEMM-iFFT on GPUShixun Wu, Yujia Zhai, Huangliang Dai, Yue Zhu et al.SC 2025 · 5 citations
- Factorized Fourier Neural OperatorsAlasdair Tran, Alexander Patrick Mathews, Lexing Xie, Cheng Soon OngICLR 2023 · 56 citations
- Discretization-invariance? On the Discretization Mismatch Errors in Neural OperatorsWenhan Gao, Ruichen Xu, Yuefan Deng, Yi LiuICLR 2025
- Neural Operators with Localized Integral and Differential KernelsMiguel Liu-Schiaffini, Julius Berner, Boris Bonev, Thorsten Kurth et al.ICML 2024 · 63 citations
- On the Benefits of Memory for Modeling Time-Dependent PDEsRicardo Buitrago Ruiz, Tanya Marwah, Albert Gu, Andrej RisteskiICLR 2025
