Leveraging Factored Action Spaces for Efficient Offline Reinforcement Learning in Healthcare
Shengpu Tang, Maggie Makar, Michael W. Sjoding, Finale Doshi-Velez, Jenna Wiens
Abstract
Many reinforcement learning (RL) applications have combinatorial action spaces, where each action is a composition of sub-actions. A standard RL approach ignores this inherent factorization structure, resulting in a potential failure to make meaningful inferences about rarely observed sub-action combinations; this is particularly problematic for offline settings, where data may be limited. In this work, we propose a form of linear Q-function decomposition induced by factored action spaces. We study the theoretical properties of our approach, identifying scenarios where it is guaranteed to lead to zero bias when used to approximate the Q-function. Outside the regimes with theoretical guarantees, we show that our approach can still be useful because it leads to better sample efficiency without necessarily sacrificing policy optimality, allowing us to achieve a better bias-variance trade-off. Across several offline RL problems using simulators and real-world datasets motivated by healthcare, we demonstrate that incorporating factored action spaces into value-based RL can result in better-performing policies. Our approach can help an agent make more accurate inferences within underexplored regions of the state-action space when applying RL to observational datasets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6135889d-1150-4f71-b2cc-2131884ad4bdCited by top-tier papers22
- Hierarchical Diffusion for Offline Decision MakingWenhao Li, Xiangfeng Wang, Bo Jin, Hongyuan ZhaICML 2023 · 80 citations
- Factored Adaptation for Non-Stationary Reinforcement LearningFan Feng, Biwei Huang, Kun Zhang, Sara MagliacaneNeurIPS 2022 · 52 citations
- Reliable Off-Policy Learning for Dosage CombinationsJonas Schweisthal, Dennis Frauen, Valentyn Melnychuk, Stefan FeuerriegelNeurIPS 2023 · 22 citations
- Importance Weighted Actor-Critic for Optimal Conservative Offline Reinforcement LearningHanlin Zhu, Paria Rashidinejad, Jiantao JiaoNeurIPS 2023 · 21 citations
- Optimistic Critic Reconstruction and Constrained Fine-Tuning for General Offline-to-Online RLQin-Wen Luo, Ming-Kun Xie, Ye-Wen Wang, Sheng-Jun HuangNeurIPS 2024 · 15 citations
Builds on9
- QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-LearningJianhao Wang, Zhizhou Ren, Terry Liu, Yang Yu et al.ICLR 2021 · 595 citations
- Batch Value-function Approximation with Only RealizabilityTengyang Xie, Nan JiangICML 2021 · 131 citations
- Off-Policy Evaluation for Large Action Spaces via EmbeddingsYuta Saito, Thorsten JoachimsICML 2022 · 62 citations
- Risk Bounds and Rademacher Complexity in Batch Reinforcement LearningYaqi Duan, Chi Jin, Zhiyuan LiICML 2021 · 53 citations
- Medical Dead-ends and Learning to Identify High-Risk States and TreatmentsMehdi Fatemi, Taylor W. Killian, Jayakumar Subramanian, Marzyeh GhassemiNeurIPS 2021 · 51 citations
Related papers
- BraVE: Offline Reinforcement Learning for Discrete Combinatorial Action SpacesMatthew Landers, Taylor W. Killian, Hugo Barnes, Tom Hartvigsen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- In-Context Compositional Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningQiushui Xu, Yuhao Huang, Yushu Jiang, Wenliang Zheng et al.ICLR 2026
- The Benefits of Model-Based Generalization in Reinforcement LearningKenny John Young, Aditya A. Ramesh, Louis Kirsch, Jürgen SchmidhuberICML 2023 · 18 citations
- Reinforcement Learning with Action ChunkingQiyang Li, Zhiyuan Zhou, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2025 · 114 citations
- Partial Action Replacement: Tackling Distribution Shift in Offline MARLYue Jin, Giovanni MontanaAAAI 2026 · 1 citation
