Low Mileage, High Fidelity: Evaluating Hypergraph Expansion Methods by Quantifying the Information Loss
David Y. Kang, Qiaozhu Mei, Sang-Wook Kim
Abstract
Hypergraphs are typically used for solving downstream tasks in two steps: expanding a hypergraph into a conventional graph, known as the hypergraph expansion, and conducting machine learning methods on the expanded graph. Depending on how hypergraph expansion is performed, certain information of the original hypergraph may be lost, which negatively affects the accuracy of downstream tasks. If the amount of information loss can be measured, one can select the best hypergraph expansion procedure and target a better downstream performance. To this end, we propose a novel framework, named the MILEAGE, to evaluate hypergraph expansion methods by measuring their degree of information loss. MILEAGE employs the following four steps: (1) expanding a hypergraph; (2) performing the unsupervised representation learning on the expanded graph; (3) reconstructing a hypergraph based on vector representations obtained; and (4) measuring the MILEAGE-score (i.e., mileage) by comparing the reconstructed and the original hypergraphs. To demonstrate the usefulness of MILEAGE, we conduct experiments via downstream tasks on three levels (i.e., node, hyperedge, and hypergraph): node classification, hyperedge prediction, and hypergraph classification on eight real-world hypergraph datasets. We observe that the average and minimum Pearson correlation coefficient between the mileage of expanded graphs and the performance of the downstream task are -0.871 and -0.904, respectively. The results validate that information loss through hypergraph expansion has a negative impact on downstream tasks and MILEAGE can effectively evaluate hypergraph expansion methods through the information loss and recommend a new method that resolves the problems of existing ones. CCS CONCEPTS • Computing methodologies → Machine learning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 608afe0a-cf79-41a2-a23b-008eaa02c990Builds on12
- LightGCN: Simplifying and Powering Graph Convolution Network for RecommendationXiangnan He, Kuan Deng, Xiang Wang, Yan Li et al.SIGIR 2020 · 4,448 citations
- Self-Supervised Multi-Channel Hypergraph Convolutional Network for Social RecommendationJunliang Yu, Hongzhi Yin, Jundong Li, Qinyong Wang et al.WWW 2021 · 598 citations
- Large-Scale Representation Learning on Graphs via BootstrappingShantanu Thakoor, Corentin Tallec, Mohammad Gheshlaghi Azar, Mehdi Azabou et al.ICLR 2022 · 311 citations
- CycleMLP: A MLP-like Architecture for Dense PredictionShoufa Chen, Enze Xie, Chongjian Ge, Runjian Chen et al.ICLR 2022 · 254 citations
- Hyper-SAGNN: a self-attention based graph neural network for hypergraphsRuochi Zhang, Yuesong Zou, Jian MaICLR 2020 · 228 citations
Related papers
- Hypergraph Joint Representation Learning for Hypervertices and Hyperedges via Cross ExpansionYuguang Yan, Yuanlin Chen, Shibo Wang, Hanrui Wu et al.AAAI 2024 · 20 citations
- From Graphs to Hypergraphs: Hypergraph Projection and its ReconstructionYanbang Wang, Jon M. KleinbergICLR 2024 · 7 citations
- I'm Me, We're Us, and I'm Us: Tri-directional Contrastive Learning on HypergraphsDongjin Lee, Kijung ShinAAAI 2023 · 69 citations
- Implicit degree bias in the link prediction taskRachith Aiyappa, Xin Wang, Munjung Kim, Ozgur Can Seckin et al.ICML 2025
- ReliK: A Reliability Measure for Knowledge Graph EmbeddingsMaximilian K. Egger, Wenyue Ma, Davide Mottin, Panagiotis Karras et al.WWW 2024 · 2 citations
