Can RLHF be More Efficient with Imperfect Reward Models? A Policy Coverage Perspective
Jiawei Huang, Bingcong Li, Christoph Dann, Niao He
Abstract
Sample efficiency is critical for online Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). While existing works investigate sample-efficient online exploration strategies, the potential of utilizing misspecified yet relevant reward models to accelerate learning remains underexplored. This paper studies how to transfer knowledge from those imperfect reward models in online RLHF. We start by identifying a novel property due to KLregularization in the RLHF objective: a policy's coverability of the optimal policy is captured by its sub-optimality. Building on this insight, we propose novel transfer learning principles and a theoretical algorithm-Transfer Policy Optimization (TPO)-with provable benefits compared to standard online learning. Empirically, inspired by our theoretical findings, we develop a win-rate-based transfer policy selection strategy with improved computational efficiency. Moreover, our empirical transfer learning technique is modular and can be integrated with various policy optimization methods, such as DPO, IPO and XPO, to further enhance their performance. We validate the effectiveness of our method through experiments on summarization tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers5
- What Makes a Reward Model a Good Teacher? An Optimization PerspectiveNoam Razin, Zixuan Wang, Hubert Strauss, Stanley Wei et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 73 citations
- Why is Your Language Model a Poor Implicit Reward Model?Noam Razin, Yong Lin, Jiarui Yao, Sanjeev AroraICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- Reshaping Reasoning in LLMs: A Theoretical Analysis of RL Training Dynamics through Pattern SelectionXingwu Chen, Tianle Li, Difan ZouICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- Online Compatible Reward Identification from Preference FeedbackSimone Drago, Marco Mussi, Alberto Maria MetelliICML 2026
- Understanding the Performance Gap in Preference Learning: A Dichotomy of RLHF and DPORuizhe Shi, Minhak Song, Runlong Zhou, Zihan Zhang et al.ICML 2026
Builds on30
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Scaling Laws for Reward Model OveroptimizationLeo Gao, John Schulman, Jacob HiltonICML 2023 · 963 citations
- Self-Rewarding Language ModelsWeizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Kyunghyun Cho, Xian Li et al.ICML 2024 · 569 citations
- Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?Ying Jin, Zhuoran Yang, Zhaoran WangICML 2021 · 419 citations
Related papers
- Exploratory Preference Optimization: Harnessing Implicit Q*-Approximation for Sample-Efficient RLHFTengyang Xie, Dylan J. Foster, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Corby Rosset et al.ICLR 2025
- -Divergence Regularized RLHF: Two Tales of Sampling and Unified AnalysesDi Wu, Chengshuai Shi, Jing Yang, Cong ShenICML 2026
- Demonstration-Regularized RLDaniil Tiapkin, Denis Belomestny, Daniele Calandriello, Eric Moulines et al.ICLR 2024 · 5 citations
- Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-constraintWei Xiong, Hanze Dong, Chenlu Ye, Ziqi Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 346 citations
- Online Iterative Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with General Preference ModelChenlu Ye, Wei Xiong, Yuheng Zhang, Hanze Dong et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 60 citations
