Optimal mass estimation in the conditional sampling model
Tomer Adar, Eldar Fischer, Amit Levi
Abstract
The conditional sampling model, introduced by Canonne, Ron and Servedio (SODA 2014, SIAM J. Comput. 2015) and independently by Chakraborty, Fischer, Goldhirsh and Matsliah (ITCS 2013, SIAM J. Comput. 2016), is a common framework for a number of studies concerning strengthened models of distribution testing. A core task in these investigations is that of estimating the mass of individual elements. The above mentioned works, and the improvement of Kumar, Meel and Pote (AISTATS 2025), provided polylogarithmic algorithms for this task.
In this work we shatter the polylogarithmic barrier, and provide an estimator for the mass of individual elements that uses only O(log log N ) + O(poly(1/ε)) conditional samples. We complement this result with an Ω(log log N ) lower bound.
We then show that our mass estimator provides an improvement (and in some cases a unifying framework) for a number of related tasks, such as testing by learning of any labelinvariant property, and distance estimation between two (unknown) distributions. In light of some known lower bounds for common restricted models, our results imply that the full power of the conditional model is indeed required for the doubly-logarithmic upper bound.
Finally, we exponentially improve the previous lower bound on testing by learning of labelinvariant properties from double-logarithmic to Ω(log N ) conditional samples, whereas our testing by learning algorithm provides an upper bound of O(poly(1/ε) • log N log log N ).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6033abd9-788f-45fa-8eb3-4ccd51dea3a8Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on4
- Random Restrictions of High Dimensional Distributions and Uniformity Testing with Subcube ConditioningClément L. Canonne, Xi Chen, Gautam Kamath, Amit Levi et al.SODA 2021 · 10 citations
- On Tolerant Distribution Testing in the Conditional Sampling ModelShyam NarayananSODA 2021 · 2 citations
- Monotonicity Testing of High-Dimensional Distributions with Subcube ConditioningDeeparnab Chakrabarty, Xi Chen, Simeon Ristic, C. Seshadhri et al.STOC 2025 · 2 citations
- Testing vs Estimation for Index-Invariant Properties in the Huge Object ModelSourav Chakraborty, Eldar Fischer, Arijit Ghosh, Amit Levi et al.STOC 2025
Related papers
- Tight Lower Bound on Equivalence Testing in Conditional Sampling ModelDiptarka Chakraborty, Sourav Chakraborty, Gunjan KumarSODA 2024 · 1 citation
- Testing Support Size More Efficiently Than Learning HistogramsRenato Ferreira Pinto Jr., Nathaniel HarmsSTOC 2025
- Instance Dependent Testing of Samplers Using Interval ConditioningRishiraj Bhattacharyya, Sourav Chakraborty, Yash Pote, Uddalok Sarkar et al.AAAI 2026
- Data Amplification: Instance-Optimal Property EstimationYi Hao, Alon OrlitskyICML 2020 · 23 citations
- Near-optimal learning of tree-structured distributions by Chow-LiuArnab Bhattacharyya, Sutanu Gayen, Eric Price, N. V. VinodchandranSTOC 2021 · 13 citations
