Probabilistic Robustness Certificates against Adversarial Attacks
Sara Taheri, Majid Zamani
Abstract
The growing use of machine learning in safetycritical settings increases vulnerability to adversarial attacks. Existing defense mechanisms typically either lack formal guarantees or depend on restrictive assumptions about the model family, the threat model, or the perturbation budget, and many only offer point-wise certification. Importantly, they often overlook the inherent stochasticity of modern training pipelines, which undermines their practical reliability. In this work, we introduce a probabilistic framework that views gradient-based training as a discrete-time stochastic dynamical system and formulates adversarial robustness as a safety verification task. Using barrier certificates (BC), we derive sufficient conditions to probabilistically certify a robust radius against worst-case ℓ p -bounded perturbation, guaranteeing that the final model parameters remain within a safe set probabilistically. For tractable computation, we represent BCs with neural networks and obtain probably approximately correct (PAC) guarantees through a scenario convex problem. Our approach determines the maximum certified radius within which the trained model achieves probabilistic accuracy at a pre-specified confidence level. Experiments on MNIST, SVHN, and CIFAR-10 show that our framework offers robustness guarantees under stochastic training, while being model-agnostic and not requiring knowledge of the attack strategy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6021f578-5536-4c0f-b8cd-24477380807fBuilds on13
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- Poisoning Web-Scale Training Datasets is PracticalNicholas Carlini, Matthew Jagielski, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Daniel Paleka et al.S&P 2024 · 309 citations
- MetaPoison: Practical General-purpose Clean-label Data PoisoningW. Ronny Huang, Jonas Geiping, Liam Fowl, Gavin Taylor et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 242 citations
- Just How Toxic is Data Poisoning? A Unified Benchmark for Backdoor and Data Poisoning AttacksAvi Schwarzschild, Micah Goldblum, Arjun Gupta, John P. Dickerson et al.ICML 2021 · 207 citations
- Certified Robustness to Label-Flipping Attacks via Randomized SmoothingElan Rosenfeld, Ezra Winston, Pradeep Ravikumar, J. Zico KolterICML 2020 · 182 citations
Related papers
- Adversarial Training and Provable Robustness: A Tale of Two ObjectivesJiameng Fan, Wenchao LiAAAI 2021 · 23 citations
- Unifying Qualitative and Quantitative Safety Verification of DNN-Controlled SystemsDapeng Zhi, Peixin Wang, Si Liu, C.-H. Luke Ong et al.CAV 2024 · 11 citations
- Probabilistically Robust Learning: Balancing Average and Worst-case PerformanceAlexander Robey, Luiz F. O. Chamon, George J. Pappas, Hamed HassaniICML 2022 · 50 citations
- Safety Guarantees for Neural Network Dynamic Systems via Stochastic Barrier FunctionsRayan Mazouz, Karan Muvvala, Akash Ratheesh, Luca Laurenti et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 44 citations
- Tight Certification of Adversarially Trained Neural Networks via Nonconvex Low-Rank Semidefinite RelaxationsHong-Ming Chiu, Richard Y. ZhangICML 2023 · 4 citations
