Adaptive Batch Size for Privately Finding Second-Order Stationary Points
Daogao Liu, Kunal Talwar
Abstract
There is a gap between finding a first-order stationary point (FOSP) and a secondorder stationary point (SOSP) under differential privacy constraints, and it remains unclear whether privately finding an SOSP is more challenging than finding an FOSP. Specifically, Ganesh et al. ( 2023 ) claimed that an α-SOSP can be found with α = Õ( 1 ), where n is the dataset size, d is the dimension, and ε is the differential privacy parameter. However, a recent analysis revealed an issue in their saddle point escape procedure, leading to weaker guarantees. Building on the SpiderBoost algorithm framework, we propose a new approach that uses adaptive batch sizes and incorporates the binary tree mechanism. Our method not only corrects this issue but also improves the results for privately finding an SOSP, achieving α = Õ( 1 ). This improved bound matches the state-of-the-art for finding a FOSP, suggesting that privately finding an SOSP may be achievable at no additional cost.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5ff7553a-d82d-4ad9-83ed-dedb5625928aCited by top-tier papers2
- On the Sample Complexity of Differentially Private Policy OptimizationYi He, Xingyu ZhouNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Finding Differentially Private Second Order Stationary Points in Stochastic Minimax OptimizationDifei Xu, Youming Tao, Meng Ding, Chenglin Fan et al.ICML 2026
Builds on12
- Private Stochastic Convex Optimization: Optimal Rates in L1 GeometryHilal Asi, Vitaly Feldman, Tomer Koren, Kunal TalwarICML 2021 · 106 citations
- A gradient sampling method with complexity guarantees for Lipschitz functions in high and low dimensionsDamek Davis, Dmitriy Drusvyatskiy, Yin Tat Lee, Swati Padmanabhan et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 77 citations
- Faster Rates of Convergence to Stationary Points in Differentially Private OptimizationRaman Arora, Raef Bassily, Tomás González, Cristóbal Guzmán et al.ICML 2023 · 37 citations
- Constant Matters: Fine-grained Error Bound on Differentially Private Continual ObservationHendrik Fichtenberger, Monika Henzinger, Jalaj UpadhyayICML 2023 · 34 citations
- Private Non-smooth ERM and SCO in Subquadratic StepsJanardhan Kulkarni, Yin Tat Lee, Daogao LiuNeurIPS 2021 · 31 citations
Related papers
- Second-Order Convergence in Private Stochastic Non-Convex OptimizationYouming Tao, Zuyuan Zhang, Dongxiao Yu, Xiuzhen Cheng et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Private (Stochastic) Non-Convex Optimization Revisited: Second-Order Stationary Points and Excess RisksDaogao Liu, Arun Ganesh, Sewoong Oh, Abhradeep Guha ThakurtaNeurIPS 2023 · 16 citations
- Private Zeroth-Order Nonsmooth Nonconvex OptimizationQinzi Zhang, Hoang Tran, Ashok CutkoskyICLR 2024 · 9 citations
- Efficient mean estimation with pure differential privacy via a sum-of-squares exponential mechanismSamuel B. Hopkins, Gautam Kamath, Mahbod MajidSTOC 2022 · 20 citations
- Robust Second-Order Nonconvex Optimization and Its Application to Low Rank Matrix SensingShuyao Li, Yu Cheng, Ilias Diakonikolas, Jelena Diakonikolas et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 3 citations
