Selective Focus: Investigating Semantics Sensitivity in Post-training Quantization for Lane Detection
Yunqian Fan, Xiuying Wei, Ruihao Gong, Yuqing Ma, Xiangguo Zhang, Qi Zhang, Xianglong Liu
Abstract
Lane detection (LD) plays a crucial role in enhancing the L2+ capabilities of autonomous driving, capturing widespread attention. The Post-Processing Quantization (PTQ) could facilitate the practical application of LD models, enabling fast speeds and limited memories without labeled data. However, prior PTQ methods do not consider the complex LD outputs that contain physical semantics, such as offsets, locations, etc., and thus cannot be directly applied to LD models. In this paper, we pioneeringly investigate semantic sensitivity to post-processing for lane detection with a novel Lane Distortion Score. Moreover, we identify two main factors impacting the LD performance after quantization, namely intra-head sensitivity and inter-head sensitivity, where a small quantization error in specific semantics can cause significant lane distortion. Thus, we propose a Selective Focus framework deployed with Semantic Guided Focus and Sensitivity Aware Selection modules, to incorporate post-processing information into PTQ reconstruction. Based on the observed intra-head sensitivity, Semantic Guided Focus is introduced to prioritize foreground-related semantics using a practical proxy. For inter-head sensitivity, we present Sensitivity Aware Selection, efficiently recognizing influential prediction heads and refining the optimization objectives at runtime. Extensive experiments have been done on a wide variety of models including keypoint-, anchor-, curve-, and segmentation-based ones. Our method produces quantized models in minutes on a single GPU and can achieve 6.4% F1 Score improvement on the CULane dataset. Code and supplementary statement can be found at https://github.com/PannenetsF/SelectiveFocus.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on11
- Learned Step Size quantizationSteven K. Esser, Jeffrey L. McKinstry, Deepika Bablani, Rathinakumar Appuswamy et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,037 citations
- Up or Down? Adaptive Rounding for Post-Training QuantizationMarkus Nagel, Rana Ali Amjad, Mart van Baalen, Christos Louizos et al.ICML 2020 · 816 citations
- BRECQ: Pushing the Limit of Post-Training Quantization by Block ReconstructionYuhang Li, Ruihao Gong, Xu Tan, Yang Yang et al.ICLR 2021 · 619 citations
- Differentiable Soft Quantization: Bridging Full-Precision and Low-Bit Neural NetworksRuihao Gong, Xianglong Liu, Shenghu Jiang, Tianxiang Li et al.ICCV 2019 · 540 citations
- RESA: Recurrent Feature-Shift Aggregator for Lane DetectionTu Zheng, Hao Fang, Yi Zhang, Wenjian Tang et al.AAAI 2021 · 348 citations
Related papers
- Rethinking Lanes and Points in Complex Scenarios for Monocular 3D Lane DetectionYifan Chang, Junjie Huang, Xiaofeng Wang, Yun Ye et al.CVPR 2025
- ADNet: Lane Shape Prediction via Anchor DecompositionLingyu Xiao, Xiang Li, Sen Yang, Wankou YangICCV 2023 · 56 citations
- A Keypoint-based Global Association Network for Lane DetectionJinsheng Wang, Yinchao Ma, Shaofei Huang, Tianrui Hui et al.CVPR 2022 · 160 citations
- Active Learning for Lane Detection: A Knowledge Distillation ApproachFengchao Peng, Chao Wang, Jianzhuang Liu, Zhen YangICCV 2021 · 18 citations
- Sketch and Refine: Towards Fast and Accurate Lane DetectionChao Chen, Jie Liu, Chang Zhou, Jie Tang et al.AAAI 2024 · 27 citations
