The Attention Market: Interpreting Online Fair Re-ranking as Manifold Optimization under Walrasian Equilibrium
Chen Xu, Wei Chu, Wenyu Hu, Fengran Mo, Jun Xu, Maarten de Rijke
Abstract
Fair re-ranking aims to promote long-tail items and enhance diversity within groups in information retrieval. While previous research on online fairness-aware re-ranking has shown promising outcomes, our comprehensive evaluation of online fair re-ranking methods over 20 settings reveals significant performance disparities among existing methods. To uncover the root causes of these inconsistencies, we reformulate fair re-ranking within an attentional market framework governed by a Walrasian Equilibrium, where the fairness is treated as a taxation cost. This market-based formulation is then coupled with manifold optimization, demonstrating that seeking this equilibrium is equivalent to performing gradient descent on a specific ranking manifold constructed by the market. Different re-ranking settings induce distinct manifold geometries, and these intrinsic geometric differences dictate the gradient landscapes and optimization trajectories. We propose ManifoldRank, an efficient online fair re-ranking algorithm. ManifoldRank adjusts gradients to align with the ranking manifold, considering various contextual settings. On the supply side, it incorporates a gradient adjustment based on different fairness requirements, accounting for associated costs. On the demand side, it empirically predicts an additional gradient adjustment term derived from the ranking scores. By integrating these two gradient adjustments, ManifoldRank effectively balances fairness and accuracy. Experimental results across multiple datasets confirm ManifoldRank's effectiveness.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5f1b0729-41c3-44b2-b547-a0f8f4cc44efBuilds on11
- User-oriented Fairness in RecommendationYunqi Li, Hanxiong Chen, Zuohui Fu, Yingqiang Ge et al.WWW 2021 · 293 citations
- FairRec: Two-Sided Fairness for Personalized Recommendations in Two-Sided PlatformsGourab K. Patro, Arpita Biswas, Niloy Ganguly, Krishna P. Gummadi et al.WWW 2020 · 268 citations
- CPFair: Personalized Consumer and Producer Fairness Re-ranking for Recommender SystemsMohammadmehdi Naghiaei, Hossein A. Rahmani, Yashar DeldjooSIGIR 2022 · 117 citations
- TFROM: A Two-sided Fairness-Aware Recommendation Model for Both Customers and ProvidersYao Wu, Jian Cao, Guandong Xu, Yudong TanSIGIR 2021 · 84 citations
- Regularized Online Allocation Problems: Fairness and BeyondSantiago R. Balseiro, Haihao Lu, Vahab S. MirrokniICML 2021 · 67 citations
Related papers
- Understanding Accuracy-Fairness Trade-offs in Re-ranking through Elasticity in EconomicsChen Xu, Jujia Zhao, Wenjie Wang, Liang Pang et al.SIGIR 2025 · 4 citations
- A Taxation Perspective for Fair Re-rankingChen Xu, Xiaopeng Ye, Wenjie Wang, Liang Pang et al.SIGIR 2024 · 11 citations
- Equity vs. Equality: Optimizing Ranking Fairness for Tailored Provider NeedsYiteng Tu, Weihang Su, Shuguang Han, Yiqun Liu et al.SIGIR 2026
- Fair Ranking with Noisy Protected AttributesAnay Mehrotra, Nisheeth K. VishnoiNeurIPS 2022 · 24 citations
- P-MMF: Provider Max-min Fairness Re-ranking in Recommender SystemChen Xu, Sirui Chen, Jun Xu, Weiran Shen et al.WWW 2023 · 41 citations
