Measuring Cross-Modal Interactions in Multimodal Models
Laura Wenderoth, Konstantin Hemker, Nikola Simidjievski, Mateja Jamnik
Abstract
Integrating AI in healthcare can greatly improve patient care and system efficiency. However, the lack of explainability in AI systems (XAI) hinders their clinical adoption, especially in multimodal decision-making that combines various data sources. The majority of existing XAI methods focus on unimodal models, which fail to capture cross-modal interactions that are crucial for understanding the combined impact of multiple data sources. Existing methods for quantifying cross-modal interactions are limited to two modalities, rely on labelled data, and depend on model performance, which is problematic in healthcare, where XAI must handle multiple data sources and provide individualised explanations. This paper introduces InterSHAP, a cross-modal interaction score that addresses the limitations of existing approaches. InterSHAP uses the Shapley interaction index to precisely separate and quantify the contributions of the individual modalities and their interactions without approximations. By integrating an open-source implementation with the SHAP package, we enhance reproducibility and ease of use. We show that InterSHAP accurately measures the presence of cross-modal interactions, can handle multiple modalities, and provides detailed explanations at a local level for individual data points. Furthermore, we apply InterSHAP to real medical multimodal datasets, and demonstrate its practical applicability for individualised explanations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5f121691-91f2-4b49-adf1-5166211825d8Cited by top-tier papers3
- Multi-modal Data Spectrum: Multi-modal Datasets are Multi-dimensionalDivyam Madaan, Varshan Muhunthan, Kyunghyun Cho, Sumit ChopraICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- I2MoE: Interpretable Multimodal Interaction-aware Mixture-of-ExpertsJiayi Xin, Sukwon Yun, Jie Peng, Inyoung Choi et al.ICML 2025
- Self-Captioning Multimodal Interaction Tuning: Amplifying Exploitable Redundancies for Robust Vision Language ModelsYuriel Ryan, Ip Man, Adriel Kuek, Paul Pu Liang et al.ICML 2026
Builds on5
- The Shapley Taylor Interaction IndexMukund Sundararajan, Kedar Dhamdhere, Ashish AgarwalICML 2020 · 199 citations
- Quantifying & Modeling Multimodal Interactions: An Information Decomposition FrameworkPaul Pu Liang, Yun Cheng, Xiang Fan, Chun Kai Ling et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 120 citations
- Perceptual Score: What Data Modalities Does Your Model Perceive?Itai Gat, Idan Schwartz, Alexander G. SchwingNeurIPS 2021 · 56 citations
- MM-SHAP: A Performance-agnostic Metric for Measuring Multimodal Contributions in Vision and Language Models & TasksLetitia Parcalabescu, Anette FrankACL 2023 · 15 citations
- Does my multimodal model learn cross-modal interactions? It's harder to tell than you might think!Jack Hessel, Lillian LeeEMNLP 2020 · 3 citations
Related papers
- Towards Trustable SHAP ScoresOlivier Létoffé, Xuanxiang Huang, João Marques-SilvaAAAI 2025 · 23 citations
- Succinct Interaction-Aware ExplanationsSascha Xu, Joscha Cüppers, Jilles VreekenKDD 2025
- Beyond TreeSHAP: Efficient Computation of Any-Order Shapley Interactions for Tree EnsemblesMaximilian Muschalik, Fabian Fumagalli, Barbara Hammer, Eyke HüllermeierAAAI 2024 · 35 citations
- Interpreting Interpretability: Understanding Data Scientists' Use of Interpretability Tools for Machine LearningHarmanpreet Kaur, Harsha Nori, Samuel Jenkins, Rich Caruana et al.CHI 2020 · 541 citations
- Functional Decomposition and Shapley Interactions for Interpreting Survival ModelsSophie Hanna Langbein, Hubert Baniecki, Fabian Fumagalli, Niklas Koenen et al.ICML 2026
