Multimodal Hypothetical Summary for Retrieval-based Multi-image Question Answering
Peize Li, Qingyi Si, Peng Fu, Zheng Lin, Yan Wang
Abstract
Retrieval-based multi-image question answering (QA) task involves retrieving multiple question-related images and synthesizing these images to generate an answer. Conventional "retrieve-then-answer" pipelines often suffer from cascading errors because the training objective of QA fails to optimize the retrieval stage. To address this issue, we propose a novel method to effectively introduce and reference retrieved information into the QA. Given the image set to be retrieved, we employ a multimodal large language model (visual perspective) and a large language model (textual perspective) to obtain multimodal hypothetical summary in question-form and description-form. By combining visual and textual perspectives, MHyS captures image content more specifically and replaces real images in retrieval, which eliminates the modality gap by transforming into text-to-text retrieval and helps improve retrieval. To more advantageously introduce retrieval with QA, we employ contrastive learning to align queries (questions) with MHyS. Moreover, we propose a coarse-to-fine strategy for calculating both sentence-level and word-level similarity scores, to further enhance retrieval and filter out irrelevant details. Our approach achieves a 3.7% absolute improvement over state-of-the-art methods on RETVQA and a 14.5% improvement over CLIP. Comprehensive experiments and detailed ablation studies demonstrate the superiority of our method.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5ec4a94d-d231-4c50-83ac-933364aed9caBuilds on15
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and GenerationJunnan Li, Dongxu Li, Caiming Xiong, Steven C. H. HoiICML 2022 · 6,549 citations
- Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum DistillationJunnan Li, Ramprasaath R. Selvaraju, Akhilesh Gotmare, Shafiq R. Joty et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 2,985 citations
- Retrieval Augmented Language Model Pre-TrainingKelvin Guu, Kenton Lee, Zora Tung, Panupong Pasupat et al.ICML 2020 · 2,937 citations
Related papers
- Overcoming the Pitfalls of Vision-Language Model for Image-Text RetrievalFeifei Zhang, Sijia Qu, Fan Shi, Changsheng XuACM MM 2024 · 12 citations
- Target-Guided Composed Image RetrievalHaokun Wen, Xian Zhang, Xuemeng Song, Yinwei Wei et al.ACM MM 2023 · 53 citations
- Delving into Multimodal Prompting for Fine-Grained Visual ClassificationXin Jiang, Hao Tang, Junyao Gao, Xiaoyu Du et al.AAAI 2024 · 71 citations
- CRIS: CLIP-Driven Referring Image SegmentationZhaoqing Wang, Yu Lu, Qiang Li, Xunqiang Tao et al.CVPR 2022 · 337 citations
- LLM-Enhanced Action-Aware Multi-Modal Prompt Tuning for Image-Text MatchingMengxiao Tian, Xinxiao Wu, Shuo YangICCV 2025 · 3 citations
