Spectral Conformal Risk Control: Distribution-Free Tail Guarantees via Bayesian Quadrature
Mohammad Mahdi Kazemi Esfeh, Qi Yan, Yongxing Zhang, Zahra Gholami, Renjie Liao, Purang Abolmaesumi
Abstract
Modern vision systems are deployed in settings where occasional catastrophic failures matter more than average accuracy-for example in medical imaging, autonomous driving, and safety monitoring. While conformal prediction gives distribution-free uncertainty guarantees, most existing methods only control mean error and are hard to tune toward rare but high-cost mistakes. We propose Bayesian-Quadrature Spectral Risk Control (BQ-SRC), a general framework for controlling tail-focused risks (such as conditional value at risk (CVaR)-style objectives) in a distribution-free way. BQ-SRC views conformal prediction through a Bayesian-quadrature lens and replaces mean-risk control with a flexible family of risk-averse criteria, while keeping the same black-box access to a trained model. A binomial testing scheme reduces the Monte Carlo conservatism of prior approaches, leading to tighter sets without sacrificing guarantees. We evaluate BQ-SRC across diverse vision tasks, including synthetic regression, closedset and zero-shot image classification, multilabel classification, and semantic segmentation. Across these settings, BQ-SRC consistently maintains finite-sample risk guarantees and often yields smaller or otherwise more informative prediction sets than existing conformal and riskcontrolling baselines, sometimes trading a modest amount of efficiency for stronger tail-risk control. The code will be publicly available at https://github.com/ MohammadMahdiKazemi/BQ_SRC.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5e78281c-1a87-4ffb-878a-4d0e3f01a372Builds on11
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with TransformersEnze Xie, Wenhai Wang, Zhiding Yu, Anima Anandkumar et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 9,661 citations
- Demystifying CLIP DataHu Xu, Saining Xie, Xiaoqing Ellen Tan, Po-Yao Huang et al.ICLR 2024 · 249 citations
- Conformal Risk ControlAnastasios Nikolas Angelopoulos, Stephen Bates, Adam Fisch, Lihua Lei et al.ICLR 2024 · 242 citations
- Meta CLIP 2: A Worldwide Scaling RecipeYung-Sung Chuang, Yang Li, Dong Wang, Ching-Feng Yeh et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 72 citations
Related papers
- Conformal Prediction as Bayesian QuadratureJake C. Snell, Thomas L. GriffithsICML 2025
- Conformal Risk Training: End-to-End Optimization of Conformal Risk ControlChristopher Yeh, Nicolas Christianson, Adam Wierman, Yisong YueNeurIPS 2025 · 14 citations
- Adversarially Robust Control of Conditional Value-at-Risk via Rockafellar-Uryasev Conformal InferenceCatherine Chen, Jingyan Shen, Xinyu Yang, Lihua LeiICML 2026
- Optimal transport-based conformal predictionGauthier Thurin, Kimia Nadjahi, Claire BoyerICML 2025
- Conformal Risk-Averse Decision Making with Action Conditional GuaranteeZihan Zhu, Shayan Kiyani, George Pappas, Hamed HassaniICML 2026 · 1 citation
